User talk:Shiro Okami - Revision history

Shiro Okami: /* R700 VTR */

2020-06-30T18:25:09Z

R700 VTR

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 30 June 2020
Line 56:		Line 56:

	That looks like the Magpul stock, fwiw.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 13:33, 30 June 2020 (EDT)		That looks like the Magpul stock, fwiw.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 13:33, 30 June 2020 (EDT)
			: Ah, now that you've mentioned it. It does look more like that one than the VTR. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 14:25, 30 June 2020 (EDT)

AgentGumby: /* R700 VTR */ new section

2020-06-30T17:33:58Z

R700 VTR: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 30 June 2020
Line 52:		Line 52:
	::There isn't any agreed upon site-wide standard, that's just the standard I've applied to myself as I think it's the most aesthetically pleasing. Different editors here do it different ways, such as gun listings going by prominence rather than alphabetized or not using gun type headings (e.g., Pistols, Revolvers, Shotguns, etc.) at all. It's generally up to the person building the page. But you make a good argument for inventory screens to go first, so I have no complaints about doing it that way. Since we're both contributing heavily to it, I just wanted to get us on the same page and avoid conflicted editing. [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 12:22, 10 April 2020 (EDT)		::There isn't any agreed upon site-wide standard, that's just the standard I've applied to myself as I think it's the most aesthetically pleasing. Different editors here do it different ways, such as gun listings going by prominence rather than alphabetized or not using gun type headings (e.g., Pistols, Revolvers, Shotguns, etc.) at all. It's generally up to the person building the page. But you make a good argument for inventory screens to go first, so I have no complaints about doing it that way. Since we're both contributing heavily to it, I just wanted to get us on the same page and avoid conflicted editing. [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 12:22, 10 April 2020 (EDT)
	::: Don't sweat it, I'm glad we've managed to sort it out. Also, I've replaced many of the over-bright screenshots with proper ones, and gave Jill the Samurai Edge. I think I still have the Desert Eagle left, though. As for the gun listing, I agree fully with you on the alphabetical order. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 12:25, 10 April 2020 (EDT)		::: Don't sweat it, I'm glad we've managed to sort it out. Also, I've replaced many of the over-bright screenshots with proper ones, and gave Jill the Samurai Edge. I think I still have the Desert Eagle left, though. As for the gun listing, I agree fully with you on the alphabetical order. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 12:25, 10 April 2020 (EDT)

			== R700 VTR ==

			That looks like the Magpul stock, fwiw.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 13:33, 30 June 2020 (EDT)

Shiro Okami: /* Screenshot order on RE3 */

2020-04-10T16:25:59Z

Screenshot order on RE3

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 10 April 2020
Line 51:		Line 51:
	: I suppose the concern I have is that inventory previews should be placed ahead of gameplay screenshots, since that gives you a very big and clear gun model to compare with the real-life photo(s) immediately above them. Cutscene shots should ideally come last, since they ironically provide the least amount of visual clarity compared to the other two types due to lighting and angles of the picture. I wasn't even sure if we had some kind of "standard" in place, so I just went with how a vast majority of other pages organized their screenshots, which I found to be quite logical. As for the differences in brightness level, I was planning on replacing them anyway, since I took those with my gamma turned way up to compensate for sun glare, which I didn't notice until it was nighttime, and if you believe it would be more appropriate for Jill to hold the Samurai Edge, I'm game. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 01:52, 10 April 2020 (EDT)		: I suppose the concern I have is that inventory previews should be placed ahead of gameplay screenshots, since that gives you a very big and clear gun model to compare with the real-life photo(s) immediately above them. Cutscene shots should ideally come last, since they ironically provide the least amount of visual clarity compared to the other two types due to lighting and angles of the picture. I wasn't even sure if we had some kind of "standard" in place, so I just went with how a vast majority of other pages organized their screenshots, which I found to be quite logical. As for the differences in brightness level, I was planning on replacing them anyway, since I took those with my gamma turned way up to compensate for sun glare, which I didn't notice until it was nighttime, and if you believe it would be more appropriate for Jill to hold the Samurai Edge, I'm game. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 01:52, 10 April 2020 (EDT)
	::There isn't any agreed upon site-wide standard, that's just the standard I've applied to myself as I think it's the most aesthetically pleasing. Different editors here do it different ways, such as gun listings going by prominence rather than alphabetized or not using gun type headings (e.g., Pistols, Revolvers, Shotguns, etc.) at all. It's generally up to the person building the page. But you make a good argument for inventory screens to go first, so I have no complaints about doing it that way. Since we're both contributing heavily to it, I just wanted to get us on the same page and avoid conflicted editing. [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 12:22, 10 April 2020 (EDT)		::There isn't any agreed upon site-wide standard, that's just the standard I've applied to myself as I think it's the most aesthetically pleasing. Different editors here do it different ways, such as gun listings going by prominence rather than alphabetized or not using gun type headings (e.g., Pistols, Revolvers, Shotguns, etc.) at all. It's generally up to the person building the page. But you make a good argument for inventory screens to go first, so I have no complaints about doing it that way. Since we're both contributing heavily to it, I just wanted to get us on the same page and avoid conflicted editing. [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 12:22, 10 April 2020 (EDT)
			::: Don't sweat it, I'm glad we've managed to sort it out. Also, I've replaced many of the over-bright screenshots with proper ones, and gave Jill the Samurai Edge. I think I still have the Desert Eagle left, though. As for the gun listing, I agree fully with you on the alphabetical order. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 12:25, 10 April 2020 (EDT)

Spartan198: /* Screenshot order on RE3 */

2020-04-10T16:22:00Z

Screenshot order on RE3

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 10 April 2020
Line 50:		Line 50:
	I appreciate the help on the RE3 page, even if our screenshots being different levels of brightness kind of irks me. But one thing I wanted to discuss how the page is organized. For gun listings, I always go alphabetical/numerical order within individual sections (Baikel, Beretta, Browning, Desert Eagle, so on). And for screenshots, I usually put things in chronological order (e.g., Mikhail on the subway with his pistol before Nicholai in NEST 2 with his pistol) and organize them cutscene first, gameplay second, and inventory third. You can see my standardized layout in its finished form on the ''[[Days Gone]]'' page. Is that organization standard okay with you or do you think a different one would be better? I also think it would be better to replace the gameplay images of Carlos using the Samurai Edge with Jill in her STARS outfit using it. What do you think? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 01:27, 10 April 2020 (EDT)		I appreciate the help on the RE3 page, even if our screenshots being different levels of brightness kind of irks me. But one thing I wanted to discuss how the page is organized. For gun listings, I always go alphabetical/numerical order within individual sections (Baikel, Beretta, Browning, Desert Eagle, so on). And for screenshots, I usually put things in chronological order (e.g., Mikhail on the subway with his pistol before Nicholai in NEST 2 with his pistol) and organize them cutscene first, gameplay second, and inventory third. You can see my standardized layout in its finished form on the ''[[Days Gone]]'' page. Is that organization standard okay with you or do you think a different one would be better? I also think it would be better to replace the gameplay images of Carlos using the Samurai Edge with Jill in her STARS outfit using it. What do you think? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 01:27, 10 April 2020 (EDT)
	: I suppose the concern I have is that inventory previews should be placed ahead of gameplay screenshots, since that gives you a very big and clear gun model to compare with the real-life photo(s) immediately above them. Cutscene shots should ideally come last, since they ironically provide the least amount of visual clarity compared to the other two types due to lighting and angles of the picture. I wasn't even sure if we had some kind of "standard" in place, so I just went with how a vast majority of other pages organized their screenshots, which I found to be quite logical. As for the differences in brightness level, I was planning on replacing them anyway, since I took those with my gamma turned way up to compensate for sun glare, which I didn't notice until it was nighttime, and if you believe it would be more appropriate for Jill to hold the Samurai Edge, I'm game. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 01:52, 10 April 2020 (EDT)		: I suppose the concern I have is that inventory previews should be placed ahead of gameplay screenshots, since that gives you a very big and clear gun model to compare with the real-life photo(s) immediately above them. Cutscene shots should ideally come last, since they ironically provide the least amount of visual clarity compared to the other two types due to lighting and angles of the picture. I wasn't even sure if we had some kind of "standard" in place, so I just went with how a vast majority of other pages organized their screenshots, which I found to be quite logical. As for the differences in brightness level, I was planning on replacing them anyway, since I took those with my gamma turned way up to compensate for sun glare, which I didn't notice until it was nighttime, and if you believe it would be more appropriate for Jill to hold the Samurai Edge, I'm game. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 01:52, 10 April 2020 (EDT)
			::There isn't any agreed upon site-wide standard, that's just the standard I've applied to myself as I think it's the most aesthetically pleasing. Different editors here do it different ways, such as gun listings going by prominence rather than alphabetized or not using gun type headings (e.g., Pistols, Revolvers, Shotguns, etc.) at all. It's generally up to the person building the page. But you make a good argument for inventory screens to go first, so I have no complaints about doing it that way. Since we're both contributing heavily to it, I just wanted to get us on the same page and avoid conflicted editing. [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 12:22, 10 April 2020 (EDT)

Shiro Okami: /* Screenshot order on RE3 */

2020-04-10T05:52:29Z

Screenshot order on RE3

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:52, 10 April 2020
Line 49:		Line 49:
	==Screenshot order on RE3==		==Screenshot order on RE3==
	I appreciate the help on the RE3 page, even if our screenshots being different levels of brightness kind of irks me. But one thing I wanted to discuss how the page is organized. For gun listings, I always go alphabetical/numerical order within individual sections (Baikel, Beretta, Browning, Desert Eagle, so on). And for screenshots, I usually put things in chronological order (e.g., Mikhail on the subway with his pistol before Nicholai in NEST 2 with his pistol) and organize them cutscene first, gameplay second, and inventory third. You can see my standardized layout in its finished form on the ''[[Days Gone]]'' page. Is that organization standard okay with you or do you think a different one would be better? I also think it would be better to replace the gameplay images of Carlos using the Samurai Edge with Jill in her STARS outfit using it. What do you think? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 01:27, 10 April 2020 (EDT)		I appreciate the help on the RE3 page, even if our screenshots being different levels of brightness kind of irks me. But one thing I wanted to discuss how the page is organized. For gun listings, I always go alphabetical/numerical order within individual sections (Baikel, Beretta, Browning, Desert Eagle, so on). And for screenshots, I usually put things in chronological order (e.g., Mikhail on the subway with his pistol before Nicholai in NEST 2 with his pistol) and organize them cutscene first, gameplay second, and inventory third. You can see my standardized layout in its finished form on the ''[[Days Gone]]'' page. Is that organization standard okay with you or do you think a different one would be better? I also think it would be better to replace the gameplay images of Carlos using the Samurai Edge with Jill in her STARS outfit using it. What do you think? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 01:27, 10 April 2020 (EDT)
			: I suppose the concern I have is that inventory previews should be placed ahead of gameplay screenshots, since that gives you a very big and clear gun model to compare with the real-life photo(s) immediately above them. Cutscene shots should ideally come last, since they ironically provide the least amount of visual clarity compared to the other two types due to lighting and angles of the picture. I wasn't even sure if we had some kind of "standard" in place, so I just went with how a vast majority of other pages organized their screenshots, which I found to be quite logical. As for the differences in brightness level, I was planning on replacing them anyway, since I took those with my gamma turned way up to compensate for sun glare, which I didn't notice until it was nighttime, and if you believe it would be more appropriate for Jill to hold the Samurai Edge, I'm game. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 01:52, 10 April 2020 (EDT)

Spartan198: /* Screenshot order on RE3 */

2020-04-10T05:31:51Z

Screenshot order on RE3

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:31, 10 April 2020
Line 48:		Line 48:

	==Screenshot order on RE3==		==Screenshot order on RE3==
	I appreciate the help on the RE3 page, even if our screenshots being different levels of brightness kind of irks me. But one thing I wanted to discuss how the page is organized. For gun listings, I always go alphabetical/numerical order within individual sections (Baikel, Beretta, Browning, Desert Eagle, so on). And for screenshots, I usually put things in chronological order (e.g., Mikhail on the subway with his pistol before Nicholai in NEST 2 with his pistol) and organize them cutscene first, gameplay second, and inventory third. Is that organization standard okay with you or do you think a different one would be better? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 01:27, 10 April 2020 (EDT)		I appreciate the help on the RE3 page, even if our screenshots being different levels of brightness kind of irks me. But one thing I wanted to discuss how the page is organized. For gun listings, I always go alphabetical/numerical order within individual sections (Baikel, Beretta, Browning, Desert Eagle, so on). And for screenshots, I usually put things in chronological order (e.g., Mikhail on the subway with his pistol before Nicholai in NEST 2 with his pistol) and organize them cutscene first, gameplay second, and inventory third. You can see my standardized layout in its finished form on the ''[[Days Gone]]'' page. Is that organization standard okay with you or do you think a different one would be better? I also think it would be better to replace the gameplay images of Carlos using the Samurai Edge with Jill in her STARS outfit using it. What do you think? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 01:27, 10 April 2020 (EDT)

Spartan198 at 05:27, 10 April 2020

2020-04-10T05:27:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:27, 10 April 2020
Line 46:		Line 46:
	: I don't recall wording it as such, though. My original edit was to state that the SPAS 12 has unreliable gas operation that makes cycling underpowered loads difficult, but another editor changed that into hot blanks, I believe. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 21:34, 24 June 2018 (EDT)		: I don't recall wording it as such, though. My original edit was to state that the SPAS 12 has unreliable gas operation that makes cycling underpowered loads difficult, but another editor changed that into hot blanks, I believe. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 21:34, 24 June 2018 (EDT)
	::Thanks. I'm trying to figure out WHO did that edit. They seem to speak decisively as if they have first hand knowledge. I know that YES, indeed there are blank adapted SPAS-12 shotguns in the movie industry. I can show you the BFAs inside the barrels. But most films use it in pump mode because it's more reliable. I didn't like the wording that it was 'impossible' to blank adapt the SPAS-12 since I'm looking at a SPAS-12 adapted for semi auto fire with blanks right now. Thanks for the reply. If it's a fellow movie armorer, I'd probably be surprised. :D best regards. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] ([[User talk:MoviePropMaster2008\|talk]]) 05:14, 25 June 2018 (EDT)		::Thanks. I'm trying to figure out WHO did that edit. They seem to speak decisively as if they have first hand knowledge. I know that YES, indeed there are blank adapted SPAS-12 shotguns in the movie industry. I can show you the BFAs inside the barrels. But most films use it in pump mode because it's more reliable. I didn't like the wording that it was 'impossible' to blank adapt the SPAS-12 since I'm looking at a SPAS-12 adapted for semi auto fire with blanks right now. Thanks for the reply. If it's a fellow movie armorer, I'd probably be surprised. :D best regards. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] ([[User talk:MoviePropMaster2008\|talk]]) 05:14, 25 June 2018 (EDT)

			==Screenshot order on RE3==
			I appreciate the help on the RE3 page, even if our screenshots being different levels of brightness kind of irks me. But one thing I wanted to discuss how the page is organized. For gun listings, I always go alphabetical/numerical order within individual sections (Baikel, Beretta, Browning, Desert Eagle, so on). And for screenshots, I usually put things in chronological order (e.g., Mikhail on the subway with his pistol before Nicholai in NEST 2 with his pistol) and organize them cutscene first, gameplay second, and inventory third. Is that organization standard okay with you or do you think a different one would be better? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 01:27, 10 April 2020 (EDT)

MoviePropMaster2008: /* Info on SPAS 12 */

2018-06-25T09:14:39Z

Info on SPAS 12

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 25 June 2018
Line 45:		Line 45:
	Were you the one who updated the SPAS 12 page with the wording that the SPAS 12 would not cycle blanks? Just curious. Thanks MPM2008		Were you the one who updated the SPAS 12 page with the wording that the SPAS 12 would not cycle blanks? Just curious. Thanks MPM2008
	: I don't recall wording it as such, though. My original edit was to state that the SPAS 12 has unreliable gas operation that makes cycling underpowered loads difficult, but another editor changed that into hot blanks, I believe. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 21:34, 24 June 2018 (EDT)		: I don't recall wording it as such, though. My original edit was to state that the SPAS 12 has unreliable gas operation that makes cycling underpowered loads difficult, but another editor changed that into hot blanks, I believe. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 21:34, 24 June 2018 (EDT)
			::Thanks. I'm trying to figure out WHO did that edit. They seem to speak decisively as if they have first hand knowledge. I know that YES, indeed there are blank adapted SPAS-12 shotguns in the movie industry. I can show you the BFAs inside the barrels. But most films use it in pump mode because it's more reliable. I didn't like the wording that it was 'impossible' to blank adapt the SPAS-12 since I'm looking at a SPAS-12 adapted for semi auto fire with blanks right now. Thanks for the reply. If it's a fellow movie armorer, I'd probably be surprised. :D best regards. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] ([[User talk:MoviePropMaster2008\|talk]]) 05:14, 25 June 2018 (EDT)

Shiro Okami: /* Info on SPAS 12 */

2018-06-25T01:34:03Z

Info on SPAS 12

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:34, 25 June 2018
Line 44:		Line 44:
	==Info on SPAS 12==		==Info on SPAS 12==
	Were you the one who updated the SPAS 12 page with the wording that the SPAS 12 would not cycle blanks? Just curious. Thanks MPM2008		Were you the one who updated the SPAS 12 page with the wording that the SPAS 12 would not cycle blanks? Just curious. Thanks MPM2008
			: I don't recall wording it as such, though. My original edit was to state that the SPAS 12 has unreliable gas operation that makes cycling underpowered loads difficult, but another editor changed that into hot blanks, I believe. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 21:34, 24 June 2018 (EDT)

MoviePropMaster2008 at 20:56, 24 June 2018

2018-06-24T20:56:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 24 June 2018
Line 41:		Line 41:
	: Done and done [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 05:33, 10 February 2017 (EST)		: Done and done [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 05:33, 10 February 2017 (EST)
	::Nice.--[[User:AnActualAK47\|AnActualAK47]] ([[User talk:AnActualAK47\|talk]]) 06:08, 10 February 2017 (EST)		::Nice.--[[User:AnActualAK47\|AnActualAK47]] ([[User talk:AnActualAK47\|talk]]) 06:08, 10 February 2017 (EST)

			==Info on SPAS 12==
			Were you the one who updated the SPAS 12 page with the wording that the SPAS 12 would not cycle blanks? Just curious. Thanks MPM2008

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 10 April 2020
Line 51:		Line 51:
	: I suppose the concern I have is that inventory previews should be placed ahead of gameplay screenshots, since that gives you a very big and clear gun model to compare with the real-life photo(s) immediately above them. Cutscene shots should ideally come last, since they ironically provide the least amount of visual clarity compared to the other two types due to lighting and angles of the picture. I wasn't even sure if we had some kind of "standard" in place, so I just went with how a vast majority of other pages organized their screenshots, which I found to be quite logical. As for the differences in brightness level, I was planning on replacing them anyway, since I took those with my gamma turned way up to compensate for sun glare, which I didn't notice until it was nighttime, and if you believe it would be more appropriate for Jill to hold the Samurai Edge, I'm game. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 01:52, 10 April 2020 (EDT)		: I suppose the concern I have is that inventory previews should be placed ahead of gameplay screenshots, since that gives you a very big and clear gun model to compare with the real-life photo(s) immediately above them. Cutscene shots should ideally come last, since they ironically provide the least amount of visual clarity compared to the other two types due to lighting and angles of the picture. I wasn't even sure if we had some kind of "standard" in place, so I just went with how a vast majority of other pages organized their screenshots, which I found to be quite logical. As for the differences in brightness level, I was planning on replacing them anyway, since I took those with my gamma turned way up to compensate for sun glare, which I didn't notice until it was nighttime, and if you believe it would be more appropriate for Jill to hold the Samurai Edge, I'm game. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 01:52, 10 April 2020 (EDT)
	::There isn't any agreed upon site-wide standard, that's just the standard I've applied to myself as I think it's the most aesthetically pleasing. Different editors here do it different ways, such as gun listings going by prominence rather than alphabetized or not using gun type headings (e.g., Pistols, Revolvers, Shotguns, etc.) at all. It's generally up to the person building the page. But you make a good argument for inventory screens to go first, so I have no complaints about doing it that way. Since we're both contributing heavily to it, I just wanted to get us on the same page and avoid conflicted editing. [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 12:22, 10 April 2020 (EDT)		::There isn't any agreed upon site-wide standard, that's just the standard I've applied to myself as I think it's the most aesthetically pleasing. Different editors here do it different ways, such as gun listings going by prominence rather than alphabetized or not using gun type headings (e.g., Pistols, Revolvers, Shotguns, etc.) at all. It's generally up to the person building the page. But you make a good argument for inventory screens to go first, so I have no complaints about doing it that way. Since we're both contributing heavily to it, I just wanted to get us on the same page and avoid conflicted editing. [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 12:22, 10 April 2020 (EDT)
			::: Don't sweat it, I'm glad we've managed to sort it out. Also, I've replaced many of the over-bright screenshots with proper ones, and gave Jill the Samurai Edge. I think I still have the Desert Eagle left, though. As for the gun listing, I agree fully with you on the alphabetical order. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 12:25, 10 April 2020 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 10 April 2020
Line 50:		Line 50:
	I appreciate the help on the RE3 page, even if our screenshots being different levels of brightness kind of irks me. But one thing I wanted to discuss how the page is organized. For gun listings, I always go alphabetical/numerical order within individual sections (Baikel, Beretta, Browning, Desert Eagle, so on). And for screenshots, I usually put things in chronological order (e.g., Mikhail on the subway with his pistol before Nicholai in NEST 2 with his pistol) and organize them cutscene first, gameplay second, and inventory third. You can see my standardized layout in its finished form on the ''[[Days Gone]]'' page. Is that organization standard okay with you or do you think a different one would be better? I also think it would be better to replace the gameplay images of Carlos using the Samurai Edge with Jill in her STARS outfit using it. What do you think? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 01:27, 10 April 2020 (EDT)		I appreciate the help on the RE3 page, even if our screenshots being different levels of brightness kind of irks me. But one thing I wanted to discuss how the page is organized. For gun listings, I always go alphabetical/numerical order within individual sections (Baikel, Beretta, Browning, Desert Eagle, so on). And for screenshots, I usually put things in chronological order (e.g., Mikhail on the subway with his pistol before Nicholai in NEST 2 with his pistol) and organize them cutscene first, gameplay second, and inventory third. You can see my standardized layout in its finished form on the ''[[Days Gone]]'' page. Is that organization standard okay with you or do you think a different one would be better? I also think it would be better to replace the gameplay images of Carlos using the Samurai Edge with Jill in her STARS outfit using it. What do you think? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 01:27, 10 April 2020 (EDT)
	: I suppose the concern I have is that inventory previews should be placed ahead of gameplay screenshots, since that gives you a very big and clear gun model to compare with the real-life photo(s) immediately above them. Cutscene shots should ideally come last, since they ironically provide the least amount of visual clarity compared to the other two types due to lighting and angles of the picture. I wasn't even sure if we had some kind of "standard" in place, so I just went with how a vast majority of other pages organized their screenshots, which I found to be quite logical. As for the differences in brightness level, I was planning on replacing them anyway, since I took those with my gamma turned way up to compensate for sun glare, which I didn't notice until it was nighttime, and if you believe it would be more appropriate for Jill to hold the Samurai Edge, I'm game. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 01:52, 10 April 2020 (EDT)		: I suppose the concern I have is that inventory previews should be placed ahead of gameplay screenshots, since that gives you a very big and clear gun model to compare with the real-life photo(s) immediately above them. Cutscene shots should ideally come last, since they ironically provide the least amount of visual clarity compared to the other two types due to lighting and angles of the picture. I wasn't even sure if we had some kind of "standard" in place, so I just went with how a vast majority of other pages organized their screenshots, which I found to be quite logical. As for the differences in brightness level, I was planning on replacing them anyway, since I took those with my gamma turned way up to compensate for sun glare, which I didn't notice until it was nighttime, and if you believe it would be more appropriate for Jill to hold the Samurai Edge, I'm game. [[User:Shiro Okami\|Shiro Okami]] ([[User talk:Shiro Okami\|talk]]) 01:52, 10 April 2020 (EDT)
			::There isn't any agreed upon site-wide standard, that's just the standard I've applied to myself as I think it's the most aesthetically pleasing. Different editors here do it different ways, such as gun listings going by prominence rather than alphabetized or not using gun type headings (e.g., Pistols, Revolvers, Shotguns, etc.) at all. It's generally up to the person building the page. But you make a good argument for inventory screens to go first, so I have no complaints about doing it that way. Since we're both contributing heavily to it, I just wanted to get us on the same page and avoid conflicted editing. [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198\|talk]]) 12:22, 10 April 2020 (EDT)