<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=STEN</id>
	<title>Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=STEN"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/STEN"/>
	<updated>2026-05-11T16:09:11Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Treasure_Island_(Ostrov_sokrovishch)_(1988)&amp;diff=1545068</id>
		<title>Treasure Island (Ostrov sokrovishch) (1988)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Treasure_Island_(Ostrov_sokrovishch)_(1988)&amp;diff=1545068"/>
		<updated>2023-01-05T10:54:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Treasure Island.jpg|thumb|350px|right|Treasure Island (1988).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Treasure Island (1988)''' (originally  Остров Сокровищ, Ostrov Sokrovisch) is a Soviet comic film, based on the book of Robert Louis Stephenson by the same name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the USA it went shorter for 34 minutes, without behind-the-scene film fragments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Animation Film Title}}&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For the shots the original version was used.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flintlock pistol==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Flintlock pistol]] othen appears as the weapon of the pirates.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TowerSeaServicePistol.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Tower Sea Service Pistol used by the British Royal Navy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI beginning.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Pirate with flintlock pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Killing Flint.jpg|thumb|500px|none|The pirate tries to shot Flint.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Flintlock Killing Fling.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Another pirat tries to kill Flint and miss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:William Bones.jpg|thumb|500px|none|At the beginning, Bill Bones cocks the hammer to kill Flint and take the map of Treasure Island. Note that the Bone's pistol lacks steel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI FPS style shooting.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Pirates fire at Jim Hawkins at the night of the &amp;quot;Admiral Benbow&amp;quot; attack.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Duel.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Behind-the-scene duel between pirates.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pirate duel.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Another behind-the-scene duel between pirates.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Brave Smaulett.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Cap'n Smollett decide to fight with mutineers. Two flintlock pistol can be seen under his belt.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sparroflintlock.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Prop replica of Jack Sparrow's 'Pirates' flintlock.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rum drinking TI.jpg|thumb|500px|none|At the Spyglass Tavern. Pistol can be seen at the table near the bottom of the screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brown Bess Flintlock Musket==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Brown Bess Flintlock Musket]] is the primary weapon for XVIII century, when the story takes place, so it appears in the film frequently.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BrownBessInfantry-Musket-1722-1768.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Brown Bess musket.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pirate guns.jpg|thumb|500px|none|The mutineer grabs his musket.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Musket.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Pirate in the front of tree is armed by musket.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Brave Smaulett.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Many muskets can be seen behind the back of Alexander Smollett.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fantasy break-loading musket ==&lt;br /&gt;
In a scene where the mutineers are grabbing guns, one of them can be seen with a break-loading musket, likely not existing in reality. Another break-loading musket can be seen in hands of Jim Hawkins during the defence of the Flint's stockade, finding out he has ran out of ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Break-loading musket.jpg|thumb|500px|none|The mutineer with break-loading musket can be seen on left.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wick cannon ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jim and cannon.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Jim tries to listen to mutineers from the barrel. The cannon can be seen behind him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Fake machine gun ==&lt;br /&gt;
After the escape of the captain Smollett, Livesey and squire Trelawney from ''Hispaniola'', pirates try to shot them from cannon, loaded like machine gun. The most famous moment at this movie. It was inspired by [[First Blood|Rambo]] with his [[M60]]. Of course, it's only intentional absurdity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Fake mschine gun.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Pirate prepares to fire from fake machine gun]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Movie]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comedy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Animation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Produced]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Treasure_Island_(Ostrov_sokrovishch)_(1988)&amp;diff=1545067</id>
		<title>Treasure Island (Ostrov sokrovishch) (1988)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Treasure_Island_(Ostrov_sokrovishch)_(1988)&amp;diff=1545067"/>
		<updated>2023-01-05T10:54:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: /* Brown Bess Flintlock Musket */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Treasure Island.jpg|thumb|350px|right|Treasure Island (1988).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Treasure Island (1988)''' (originally  Остров Сокровищ, Ostrov Sokrovisch) is a Soviet comic film, based on the book of Robert Louis Stephenson by the same name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the USA it went shorter for 34 minutes, without behind-the-scene film fragments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Animation Film Title}}&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For the shots the original version was used.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flintlock pistol==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Flintlock pistol]] othen appears as the weapon of the pirates.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TowerSeaServicePistol.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Tower Sea Service Pistol used by the British Royal Navy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI beginning.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Pirate with flintlock pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Killing Flint.jpg|thumb|500px|none|The pirate tries to shot Flint.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Flintlock Killing Fling.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Another pirat tries to kill Flint and miss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:William Bones.jpg|thumb|500px|none|At the beginning, Bill Bones cocks the hammer to kill Flint and take the map of Treasure Island. Note that the Bone's pistol lacks steel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI FPS style shooting.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Pirates fire at Jim Hawkins at the night of the &amp;quot;Admiral Benbow&amp;quot; attack.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Duel.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Behind-the-scene duel between pirates.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pirate duel.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Another behind-the-scene duel between pirates.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Brave Smaulett.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Cap'n Smaulett decide to fight with mutineers. Two flinlocks pistol can be seen under his belt.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sparroflintlock.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Prop replica of Jack Sparrow's 'Pirates' flintlock.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rum drinking TI.jpg|thumb|500px|none|At the Spyglass Tavern. Pistol can be seen at the table near the bottom of the screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brown Bess Flintlock Musket==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Brown Bess Flintlock Musket]] is the primary weapon for XVIII century, when the story takes place, so it appears in the film frequently.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BrownBessInfantry-Musket-1722-1768.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Brown Bess musket.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pirate guns.jpg|thumb|500px|none|The mutineer grabs his musket.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Musket.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Pirate in the front of tree is armed by musket.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Brave Smaulett.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Many muskets can be seen behind the back of Alexander Smollett.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fantasy break-loading musket ==&lt;br /&gt;
In a scene where the mutineers are grabbing guns, one of them can be seen with a break-loading musket, likely not existing in reality. Another break-loading musket can be seen in hands of Jim Hawkins during the defence of the Flint's stockade, finding out he has ran out of ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Break-loading musket.jpg|thumb|500px|none|The mutineer with break-loading musket can be seen on left.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wick cannon ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jim and cannon.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Jim tries to listen to mutineers from the barrel. The cannon can be seen behind him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Fake machine gun ==&lt;br /&gt;
After the escape of the captain Smaulennt, Livesy and squire Trelawney from ''Hispaniola'', pirates try to shot them from cannon, loaded like machine gun. The most famous moment at this movie. It was inspired by [[First Blood|Rambo]] with his [[M60]]. Of course, it's only intentional absurdity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Fake mschine gun.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Pirate prepares to fire from fake machine gun]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Movie]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comedy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Animation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Produced]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Treasure_Island_(Ostrov_sokrovishch)_(1988)&amp;diff=1545066</id>
		<title>Treasure Island (Ostrov sokrovishch) (1988)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Treasure_Island_(Ostrov_sokrovishch)_(1988)&amp;diff=1545066"/>
		<updated>2023-01-05T10:52:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: /* Fantasy break-loading musket */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Treasure Island.jpg|thumb|350px|right|Treasure Island (1988).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Treasure Island (1988)''' (originally  Остров Сокровищ, Ostrov Sokrovisch) is a Soviet comic film, based on the book of Robert Louis Stephenson by the same name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the USA it went shorter for 34 minutes, without behind-the-scene film fragments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Animation Film Title}}&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For the shots the original version was used.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flintlock pistol==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Flintlock pistol]] othen appears as the weapon of the pirates.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TowerSeaServicePistol.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Tower Sea Service Pistol used by the British Royal Navy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI beginning.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Pirate with flintlock pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Killing Flint.jpg|thumb|500px|none|The pirate tries to shot Flint.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Flintlock Killing Fling.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Another pirat tries to kill Flint and miss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:William Bones.jpg|thumb|500px|none|At the beginning, Bill Bones cocks the hammer to kill Flint and take the map of Treasure Island. Note that the Bone's pistol lacks steel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI FPS style shooting.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Pirates fire at Jim Hawkins at the night of the &amp;quot;Admiral Benbow&amp;quot; attack.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Duel.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Behind-the-scene duel between pirates.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pirate duel.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Another behind-the-scene duel between pirates.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Brave Smaulett.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Cap'n Smaulett decide to fight with mutineers. Two flinlocks pistol can be seen under his belt.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sparroflintlock.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Prop replica of Jack Sparrow's 'Pirates' flintlock.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rum drinking TI.jpg|thumb|500px|none|At the Spyglass Tavern. Pistol can be seen at the table near the bottom of the screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brown Bess Flintlock Musket==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Brown Bess Flintlock Musket]] is the primary weapon for 1700th, when the story takes place, it usually appears in the film.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BrownBessInfantry-Musket-1722-1768.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Brown Bess musket.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pirate guns.jpg|thumb|500px|none|The mutineer grabs his musket.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Musket.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Pirate in the front of tree is armed by musket.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Brave Smaulett.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Many muskets can be seen behind the back of Alexander Smaulett.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fantasy break-loading musket ==&lt;br /&gt;
In a scene where the mutineers are grabbing guns, one of them can be seen with a break-loading musket, likely not existing in reality. Another break-loading musket can be seen in hands of Jim Hawkins during the defence of the Flint's stockade, finding out he has ran out of ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Break-loading musket.jpg|thumb|500px|none|The mutineer with break-loading musket can be seen on left.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wick cannon ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jim and cannon.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Jim tries to listen to mutineers from the barrel. The cannon can be seen behind him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Fake machine gun ==&lt;br /&gt;
After the escape of the captain Smaulennt, Livesy and squire Trelawney from ''Hispaniola'', pirates try to shot them from cannon, loaded like machine gun. The most famous moment at this movie. It was inspired by [[First Blood|Rambo]] with his [[M60]]. Of course, it's only intentional absurdity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TI Fake mschine gun.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Pirate prepares to fire from fake machine gun]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Movie]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comedy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Animation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Produced]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=1166200</id>
		<title>User talk:STEN</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=1166200"/>
		<updated>2018-03-08T15:15:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: Blanked the page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=899803</id>
		<title>User talk:STEN</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=899803"/>
		<updated>2015-03-10T11:45:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: Архивировал за ненадобностью.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Stalin Subway ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, '''STEN'''. I want to talk about article Stalin Subway. You abandoned this article, so I can work on it in future. This screenshots are useful. In near future I shall add new information and screenshots. [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 13:48, 9 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
* Поскольку это наша беседа, я вижу более логичным говорить на родном для нас двоих языке (хотя, вероятно, вы и не знали об этом).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Кроме меня, над скриншотами работал кто-то другой. Как итог - визуальное оформление статьи незачёт полнейший. Лучше просто взять да сделать всё заново - так будет лучше.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Сама игра в сравнении с другими чисто русскими шутерами смотрится более-менее нормально (даже образцово). Но в сравнении с другими... Самую хорошую оценку этой игре поставила &amp;quot;Игромания&amp;quot; - 6.0 из 10. Это - твёрдая тройка. А второй - 3.0 (слабая двойка). Качество этого продукта оставляет желать лучшего по всем параметрам. Начиная от запредельно бредового сюжета без намёка на логику (авторы решительно не понимали реалий начала 1950х), вплоть до декораций. У русского языка есть для этого хорошее словосочетание - &amp;quot;развесистая клюква&amp;quot;. Не экспортный товар, но и не для отечественного потребителя - не пойми для кого.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Да и стоит ли игра описания? Тот же [[Wolfenstein 3D]] для Atari Jaguar - в гораздо большей степени. Как минимум - два оружия. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:53, 10 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::All edits must be in English. If you want to use Russian, please trade email addresses. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 07:03, 10 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I read all [[Rules, Standards and Principles]] again and didn't find ANY words about the need to use only English between foreign users or something like that. It's our conservation. If I wanted to sent this info for you or somebody else, I would use English. I use English for talk with users who dunno Ukrainian or Russian or game/movie pages - I can understand this. Our native language ain't English - is there any sence to use it between us? And so more, you can always translate it with Google Translator - e.g. if you worry that we are talking about the things that are eligible. It can help with understanding - BTW, it's your words, not mine. Do you agree that it seem to be logical? Or not? Thanks for you also. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 07:43, 10 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=899801</id>
		<title>User talk:STEN</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=899801"/>
		<updated>2015-03-10T11:43:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: /* Stalin Subway */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Reply ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:17, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* First of all: what's your thoughts about [[Isle of the Dead|this]]? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:19, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_______&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache because of exams and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. I think it'll be better to work with something different. Can you move this from the words &amp;quot;Atari Jaguar&amp;quot; onto my page talk? I think it wouldn't be offtopic for this game.--[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your formatting for [[Isle of the Dead]] is not correct. Please reduce the size of the photos for the cover art.  You can take a look at a video game such as [[Resident Evil: Revelations]] for reference.  If you don't choose to fix this page soon, it will be deleted.  --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 17:52, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Ben, I'm not sure, which part of it? Do you mean the pictures for Mossberg or the cover itself? If it's the second case, which elements of this should be deleted? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:13, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You need to write this code after &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; right above where you start to list the guns.  Your cover photos for the Mossberg 500 entry should no bigger than 400px.  Any unidentified weapons should be on the discussion page. --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 04:42, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Fixed. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:55, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I have made some final edits for your future reference.   Also, weapons that do not actually appear in the game should not be made into entries.  --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 05:17, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Stalin Subway ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, '''STEN'''. I want to talk about article Stalin Subway. You abandoned this article, so I can work on it in future. This screenshots are useful. In near future I shall add new information and screenshots. [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 13:48, 9 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
* Поскольку это наша беседа, я вижу более логичным говорить на родном для нас двоих языке (хотя, вероятно, вы и не знали об этом).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Кроме меня, над скриншотами работал кто-то другой. Как итог - визуальное оформление статьи незачёт полнейший. Лучше просто взять да сделать всё заново - так будет лучше.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Сама игра в сравнении с другими чисто русскими шутерами смотрится более-менее нормально (даже образцово). Но в сравнении с другими... Самую хорошую оценку этой игре поставила &amp;quot;Игромания&amp;quot; - 6.0 из 10. Это - твёрдая тройка. А второй - 3.0 (слабая двойка). Качество этого продукта оставляет желать лучшего по всем параметрам. Начиная от запредельно бредового сюжета без намёка на логику (авторы решительно не понимали реалий начала 1950х), вплоть до декораций. У русского языка есть для этого хорошее словосочетание - &amp;quot;развесистая клюква&amp;quot;. Не экспортный товар, но и не для отечественного потребителя - не пойми для кого.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Да и стоит ли игра описания? Тот же [[Wolfenstein 3D]] для Atari Jaguar - в гораздо большей степени. Как минимум - два оружия. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:53, 10 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::All edits must be in English. If you want to use Russian, please trade email addresses. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 07:03, 10 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I read all [[Rules, Standards and Principles]] again and didn't find ANY words about the need to use only English between foreign users or something like that. It's our conservation. If I wanted to sent this info for you or somebody else, I would use English. I use English for talk with users who dunno Ukrainian or Russian or game/movie pages - I can understand this. Our native language ain't English - is there any sence to use it between us? And so more, you can always translate it with Google Translator - e.g. if you worry that we are talking about the things that are eligible. It can help with understanding - BTW, it's your words, not mine. Do you agree that it seem to be logical? Or not? Thanks for you also. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 07:43, 10 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=899800</id>
		<title>User talk:STEN</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=899800"/>
		<updated>2015-03-10T11:43:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: /* Stalin Subway */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Reply ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:17, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* First of all: what's your thoughts about [[Isle of the Dead|this]]? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:19, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_______&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache because of exams and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. I think it'll be better to work with something different. Can you move this from the words &amp;quot;Atari Jaguar&amp;quot; onto my page talk? I think it wouldn't be offtopic for this game.--[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your formatting for [[Isle of the Dead]] is not correct. Please reduce the size of the photos for the cover art.  You can take a look at a video game such as [[Resident Evil: Revelations]] for reference.  If you don't choose to fix this page soon, it will be deleted.  --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 17:52, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Ben, I'm not sure, which part of it? Do you mean the pictures for Mossberg or the cover itself? If it's the second case, which elements of this should be deleted? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:13, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You need to write this code after &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; right above where you start to list the guns.  Your cover photos for the Mossberg 500 entry should no bigger than 400px.  Any unidentified weapons should be on the discussion page. --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 04:42, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Fixed. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:55, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I have made some final edits for your future reference.   Also, weapons that do not actually appear in the game should not be made into entries.  --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 05:17, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Stalin Subway ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, '''STEN'''. I want to talk about article Stalin Subway. You abandoned this article, so I can work on it in future. This screenshots are useful. In near future I shall add new information and screenshots. [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 13:48, 9 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
* Поскольку это наша беседа, я вижу более логичным говорить на родном для нас двоих языке (хотя, вероятно, вы и не знали об этом).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Кроме меня, над скриншотами работал кто-то другой. Как итог - визуальное оформление статьи незачёт полнейший. Лучше просто взять да сделать всё заново - так будет лучше.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Сама игра в сравнении с другими чисто русскими шутерами смотрится более-менее нормально (даже образцово). Но в сравнении с другими... Самую хорошую оценку этой игре поставила &amp;quot;Игромания&amp;quot; - 6.0 из 10. Это - твёрдая тройка. А второй - 3.0 (слабая двойка). Качество этого продукта оставляет желать лучшего по всем параметрам. Начиная от запредельно бредового сюжета без намёка на логику (авторы решительно не понимали реалий начала 1950х), вплоть до декораций. У русского языка есть для этого хорошее словосочетание - &amp;quot;развесистая клюква&amp;quot;. Не экспортный товар, но и не для отечественного потребителя - не пойми для кого.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Да и стоит ли игра описания? Тот же [[Wolfenstein 3D]] для Atari Jaguar - в гораздо большей степени. Как минимум - два оружия. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:53, 10 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::All edits must be in English. If you want to use Russian, please trade email addresses. Thanks. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 07:03, 10 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I read all [[Rules, Standards and Principles]] again and didn't find the words about it. It's our conservation. If I wanted to sent this info for you or somebody else, I would use English. I use English for talk with users who dunno Ukrainian or Russian or game/movie pages - I can understand this. Our native language ain't English - is there any sence to use it between us? And so more, you can always translate it with Google Translator - e.g. if you worry that we are talking about the things that are eligible. It can help with understanding - BTW, it's your words, not mine. Do you agree that it seem to be logical? Or not? Thanks for you also. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 07:43, 10 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=899752</id>
		<title>User talk:STEN</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=899752"/>
		<updated>2015-03-10T08:53:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: /* Stalin Subway */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Reply ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:17, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* First of all: what's your thoughts about [[Isle of the Dead|this]]? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:19, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_______&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache because of exams and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. I think it'll be better to work with something different. Can you move this from the words &amp;quot;Atari Jaguar&amp;quot; onto my page talk? I think it wouldn't be offtopic for this game.--[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your formatting for [[Isle of the Dead]] is not correct. Please reduce the size of the photos for the cover art.  You can take a look at a video game such as [[Resident Evil: Revelations]] for reference.  If you don't choose to fix this page soon, it will be deleted.  --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 17:52, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Ben, I'm not sure, which part of it? Do you mean the pictures for Mossberg or the cover itself? If it's the second case, which elements of this should be deleted? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:13, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You need to write this code after &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; right above where you start to list the guns.  Your cover photos for the Mossberg 500 entry should no bigger than 400px.  Any unidentified weapons should be on the discussion page. --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 04:42, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Fixed. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:55, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I have made some final edits for your future reference.   Also, weapons that do not actually appear in the game should not be made into entries.  --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 05:17, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Stalin Subway ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, '''STEN'''. I want to talk about article Stalin Subway. You abandoned this article, so I can work on it in future. This screenshots are useful. In near future I shall add new information and screenshots. [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 13:48, 9 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
* Поскольку это наша беседа, я вижу более логичным говорить на родном для нас двоих языке (хотя, вероятно, вы и не знали об этом).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Кроме меня, над скриншотами работал кто-то другой. Как итог - визуальное оформление статьи незачёт полнейший. Лучше просто взять да сделать всё заново - так будет лучше.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Сама игра в сравнении с другими чисто русскими шутерами смотрится более-менее нормально (даже образцово). Но в сравнении с западными... Самую хорошую оценку этой игре поставила &amp;quot;Игромания&amp;quot; - 6.0 из 10. Это - твёрдая тройка. А второй - 3.0 (слабая двойка). Качество этого продукта оставляет желать лучшего по всем параметрам. Начиная от запредельно бредового сюжета без намёка на логику (авторы решительно не понимали реалий начала 1950х), вплоть до декораций. У русского языка есть для этого хорошее словосочетание - &amp;quot;развесистая клюква&amp;quot;. Только почему-то сделанная русскими. Не экспертный товар, но и не для отечественного потребителя - не пойми для кого.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Да и стоит ли игра описания? Тот же [[Wolfenstein 3D]] для Atari Jaguar - в гораздо большей степени. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:53, 10 March 2015 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Stalin_Subway&amp;diff=899502</id>
		<title>Talk:The Stalin Subway</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Stalin_Subway&amp;diff=899502"/>
		<updated>2015-03-09T17:08:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: The info is too bad too use it for anything. It'd be better to write it from blank page. And retake the shots.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Stalin_Subway&amp;diff=899261</id>
		<title>Talk:The Stalin Subway</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Stalin_Subway&amp;diff=899261"/>
		<updated>2015-03-09T04:06:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: There will be hard NO on this page also.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=898183</id>
		<title>User talk:STEN</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=898183"/>
		<updated>2015-03-05T09:55:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: /* Reply */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Reply ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:17, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* First of all: what's your thoughts about [[Isle of the Dead|this]]? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:19, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_______&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache because of exams and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. I think it'll be better to work with something different. Can you move this from the words &amp;quot;Atari Jaguar&amp;quot; onto my page talk? I think it wouldn't be offtopic for this game.--[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your formatting for [[Isle of the Dead]] is not correct. Please reduce the size of the photos for the cover art.  You can take a look at a video game such as [[Resident Evil: Revelations]] for reference.  If you don't choose to fix this page soon, it will be deleted.  --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 17:52, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Ben, I'm not sure, which part of it? Do you mean the pictures for Mossberg or the cover itself? If it's the second case, which elements of this should be deleted? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:13, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You need to write this code after &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; right above where you start to list the guns.  Your cover photos for the Mossberg 500 entry should no bigger than 400px.  Any unidentified weapons should be on the discussion page. --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 04:42, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Fixed. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:55, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=File:Isle_of_the_Dead_cover_shogun.jpg&amp;diff=898177</id>
		<title>File:Isle of the Dead cover shogun.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=File:Isle_of_the_Dead_cover_shogun.jpg&amp;diff=898177"/>
		<updated>2015-03-05T09:52:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=File:Isle_of_the_Dead_back_CD_cover.jpg&amp;diff=898174</id>
		<title>File:Isle of the Dead back CD cover.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=File:Isle_of_the_Dead_back_CD_cover.jpg&amp;diff=898174"/>
		<updated>2015-03-05T09:50:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: STEN uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:Isle of the Dead back CD cover.jpg&amp;amp;quot;: Reduced the size of it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=898161</id>
		<title>User talk:STEN</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=898161"/>
		<updated>2015-03-05T09:13:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Reply ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:17, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* First of all: what's your thoughts about [[Isle of the Dead|this]]? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:19, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_______&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache because of exams and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. I think it'll be better to work with something different. Can you move this from the words &amp;quot;Atari Jaguar&amp;quot; onto my page talk? I think it wouldn't be offtopic for this game.--[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your formatting for [[Isle of the Dead]] is not correct. Please reduce the size of the photos for the cover art.  You can take a look at a video game such as [[Resident Evil: Revelations]] for reference.  If you don't choose to fix this page soon, it will be deleted.  --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 17:52, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Ben, I'm not sure, which part of it? Do you mean the pictures for Mossberg or the cover itself? If it's the second case, which elements of this should be deleted? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 04:13, 5 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=897887</id>
		<title>User talk:STEN</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=897887"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T16:26:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Reply ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:17, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* First of all: what's your thoughts about [[Isle of the Dead|this]]? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:19, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Moved:&lt;br /&gt;
_______&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache because of exams and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. I think it'll be better to work with something different. Can you move this from the words &amp;quot;Atari Jaguar&amp;quot; onto my page talk? I think it wouldn't be offtopic for this game.--[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897886</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897886"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T16:26:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: Moved into my page, if you don't mind.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897884</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897884"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T16:19:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache because of exams and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. I think it'll be better to work with something different. Can you move this from the words &amp;quot;Atari Jaguar&amp;quot; onto my page talk? I think it wouldn't be offtopic for this game.--[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897883</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897883"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T16:15:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache because of exams and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. I think it'll be better to work with something different. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897882</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897882"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T16:14:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. I think it'll be better to work with something different. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897880</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897880"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T16:12:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897879</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897879"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T16:08:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. I understood Egypteans, Americans, Russians, Arabeans, Australians, Ukrainians, Jews, Tajics, Uzbecs, Kazakhs; I understood Chinese woman from the south of the Chinese Republic. All of them understood me, even in some of the cases I used Russian. Some of them even were suprised how much English I know in my 15. The elder of them was born in 1914 (Rest in Peace), the youngest - in 2007. Why I can't understand man from the Chinese Republic?!! Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897878</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897878"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T16:07:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. I understood Egypteans, Americans, Russians, Arabeans, Australians, Ukrainians, Jews, Tajics, Uzbecs, Kazakhs; I understood Chinese woman from the south of the Chinese Republic. All of them understood me, even in some of the cases I used Russian. Some of them even were suprised how much English I know in my 15. The elder of them was born in 1914 (Rest in Peace), the youngest - in 2007. Why I can't understand man from the Chinese Republic?!! Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by cheching this out? but I don't need in your care now. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897877</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897877"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T16:05:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. I understood Egypteans, Americans, Russians, Arabeans, Australians, Ukrainians, Jews, Tajics, Uzbecs, Kazakhs; I understood Chinese woman from the south of the Chinese Republic. All of them understood me, even in some of the cases I used Russian. Some of them even were suprised how much English I know in my 15. The elder of them was born in 1914 (Rest in Peace), the youngest - in 2007. Why I can't understand man from the Chinese Republic?!! Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by cheching this out. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897876</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897876"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T16:04:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. I understood Egypteans, Americans, Russians, Arabeans, Australians, Ukrainians, Jews, Tajics, Uzbecs, Kazakhs; I understood Chinese woman from the south of the Chinese Republic. All of them understood me, even in some of the cases I used Russian. Some of them even were suprised how much English I know in my 15. The elder of them was born in 1914 (Rest in Peace), the youngest - in 2007. Why I can't understand man from the Chinese Republic?!! Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache and I can't check this now. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897875</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897875"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T16:03:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. I understood Egypteans, Americans, Russians, Arabeans, Australians, Ukrainians, Jews, Tajics, Uzbecs, Kazakhs; I understood Chinese woman from the south of the Chinese Republic. All of them understood me, even in some of the cases I used Russian. Some of them even were suprised how much English I know in my 15. The elder of them was born in 1914 (Rest in Peace), the youngest - in 2007. Why I can't understand man from the Chinese Republic?!! Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see [https://translate.google.com/ here]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm sorry I've got a headache and I can't check this kind of trolling out. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897873</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897873"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:55:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. I understood Egypteans, Americans, Russians, Arabeans, Australians, Ukrainians, Jews, Tajics, Uzbecs, Kazakhs; I understood Chinese woman from the south of the Chinese Republic. All of them understood me, even in some of the cases I used Russian. Some of them even were suprised how much English I know in my 15. The elder of them was born in 1914 (Rest in Peace), the youngest - in 2007. Why I can't understand man from the Chinese Republic?!! Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897872</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897872"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:55:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. I understood Egypteans, Americans, Russians, Arabeans, Australians, Ukrainians, Jews, Tajics, Uzbecs, Kazakhs; I understood Chinese woman from the south of the Chinese Republic. All of them understood me, even in some of the cases I used Russian. Some of them even were suprised how much English I know in my 15. The elder of them was born in 1914 (Rest in Peace), the youngest - in 2007. Why I don't understand man from the Chinese Republic?!! Can you explain me?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897870</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897870"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:53:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. I understood Egypteans, Americans, Russians, Arabeans, Australians, Ukrainians, Jews, Tajics, Uzbecs, Kazakhs; I understood Chinese woman from the south of the Chinese Republic. All of them understood me, even in some of the cases I used Russian. Some of them even were suprised how much English I know in my 15. The elder of them was born in 1914 (Rest in Peace), the youngest - in 2007. Why I don't understand man from the Chinese Republic?!! --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897869</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897869"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:51:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard '''NO''' on ''Wolftenstein 3D''. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: &amp;quot;Hard no&amp;quot; - after &amp;quot;Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk&amp;quot;... I don't know. I understood Egypteans, Americans, Russians, Arabeans, Australians, Ukrainians, Jews, Tajics, Uzbecs, Kazakhs; I understood Chinese woman from the south of the Chinese Republic. All of them understood me, even in some of the cases I used Russian. Some of them even were suprised how much English I know in my 15. The elder of them was born in 1914 (Rest in Peace), the youngest - in 2004. Why I don't understand man from the Chinese Republic?!! --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897866</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897866"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:29:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897865</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897865"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:27:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game, as I understand you?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897864</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897864"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:27:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game, as I understand you?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897859</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897859"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:24:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game, as I understand you?  --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897858</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897858"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:22:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for ''[[Talk:Stalin_Subway,_The|Stalin Subway]]''. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Spenging time for arguing... Heh, now I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? If I wanted to do it, I would go to another projects. Hmmm... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game, as I understand you? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897853</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897853"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:10:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right do say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897852</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897852"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:07:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right do say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897850</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897850"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:07:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right do say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I looked the rules again and didn't understand it. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897849</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897849"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:07:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right do say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? I showed the rules and didn't understand it. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897848</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897848"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T15:05:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There have been calls to delete the ''Doom'' page from day one. And at least in ''Doom'' it's clearly a Beretta 92F. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:55, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: [http://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/images/f/f2/Wolfenstein_3D_-_JAG_-_Level_1.png this picture] can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right do say it. But then, I'm puzzled. ''Which'' old games are legiable? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897846</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897846"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T14:50:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question, don't mind. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897843</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897843"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T14:37:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. Just another question. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897841</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897841"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T14:30:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]] and other classic games from 1990s? The situation is almost the same. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897840</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897840"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T14:30:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]]? [[Duke Nukem 3D]]? [[Blood]]? The situation is almost the same. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897839</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897839"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T14:29:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]]? The situation is almost the same. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897838</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897838"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T14:27:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Even [[Doom (VG)]]? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897837</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897837"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T14:27:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's really possibly to make any positive IDs from any game from 1993. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:24, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: [[Doom (VG)]] isn't positive? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=File:Isle_of_the_Dead_M26_trap.jpg&amp;diff=897832</id>
		<title>File:Isle of the Dead M26 trap.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=File:Isle_of_the_Dead_M26_trap.jpg&amp;diff=897832"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T14:24:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897831</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897831"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T14:21:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* At least not only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897830</id>
		<title>Talk:The Walking Dead: Dead City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Walking_Dead:_Dead_City&amp;diff=897830"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T14:20:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure this is eligible, especially if the most identifiable firearm is from cover art. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:18, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* Note only the cover. M26 grande also. I'll paste it later. --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:20, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=897829</id>
		<title>User talk:STEN</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=User_talk:STEN&amp;diff=897829"/>
		<updated>2015-03-04T14:19:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;STEN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Reply ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 09:17, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* First of all: what's your thoughts about [[Isle of the Dead|this]]? --[[User:STEN|STEN]] ([[User talk:STEN|talk]]) 09:19, 4 March 2015 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>STEN</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>