<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jan</id>
	<title>Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jan"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jan"/>
	<updated>2026-05-06T13:34:16Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:End_of_Watch&amp;diff=709708</id>
		<title>Talk:End of Watch</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:End_of_Watch&amp;diff=709708"/>
		<updated>2013-06-28T04:13:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* Cartel 1911s */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Glock 22 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just FYI for anyone that is wondering, I ID'd the Glocks as 22s from a ''Total Film'' article which had a closeup shot of the side of the pistol showing the slide markings.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 11:21, 2 August 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the beginning of the film, the guy said his gun is a Glock 19 [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] ([[User talk:Excalibur01|talk]]) 00:36, 23 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Look at the bottom discussion topic. if he says that it is a goof, as firstly it is a full size gun so would be a 17 if it was a 9mm, and promotional images show that the physical gun has 22 slide markings.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 13:46, 23 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==DEA Weapons?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Saw a trailer for this earlier, and saw a DEA Agent armed with some sort of [[M16 rifle series|AR]]-type carbine. Anyone think they can ID it for the page? [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] ([[User talk:Orca1 9904|talk]]) 09:51, 16 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't see it from all the trailers I've seen. Guess we'll have to wait for the movie to come out. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] ([[User talk:Excalibur01|talk]]) 12:07, 16 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that literally all you see of it in the trailer is the fact that it has a Crane stock.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 12:34, 16 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The camera perspective in the scene is from the 'chest cam' so most of its shaky and his hand is covering the trigger and the fire selector is always facing the user so i can't tell what kind of AR-15 it is, other than it's a AR-15 (Had a flat top, FA, full fencing and possably a brass deflector, so i guess assuming it was a M4 would be fine &amp;gt;_&amp;gt;), had a Crane Stock(?), KAC rail covers, a foregrip and was using a EOTech XPS 3 or 2, also seemed to have a short barrel, a educated guess would be a 11.5&amp;quot; barrel. [[User:Scarecrow|scarecrow]] ([[User talk:Scarecrow|talk]]) 11:14, 24 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The barrel looks a bit too long to be the Model 933 [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] ([[User talk:Excalibur01|talk]]) 12:31, 24 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 92? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Saw this in another trailer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Endofwatch92.jpg|thumb|600px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't be 100% on whether the specific model is correct without seeing more of the gun, but think it is actually a [[Smith &amp;amp; Wesson 39]]. Either way, I think it is a S&amp;amp;W auto rather than a Beretta.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 12:45, 16 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:That's definitely some kind of Smith &amp;amp; Wesson auto.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] ([[User talk:Jeddostotle7|talk]]) 12:50, 16 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
On closer examination I'll upgrade what I said to it definitely being a S&amp;amp;W 39. Thought it might have been a 439, but you can just make out the hole in the hammer which wasn't there on the 2nd gen pistols.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 13:33, 16 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Any chance the Glocks are actually 19's? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I ask because I saw the movie tonight and Taylor specifically calls his Glock a &amp;quot;Glock 19&amp;quot;. Now I know normally I shouldn't go by what was said in the script but during one of the POV segments, I think I might have seen a 19 on the slide. [[User:Bristow8411|Bristow8411]] ([[User talk:Bristow8411|talk]]) 01:00, 22 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I id'd them as 22 based on promotional photos in a magazine article where you could see the &amp;quot;22&amp;quot; slide markings.  Will try and see if I can find the shot online. Also they look like they have full length slides to me, particularly in the shot where Zavala is coming through the door. Could be that the two of them are carrying different guns. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 04:50, 22 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Found it:[[File:EOW Glock slide markings.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Hires promotional image showing the Glock slide markings.]]--[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 04:56, 22 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps they could indeed be carrying 2 different guns, I honestly can't say without seeing the movie again and potentially a pause button. [[User:Bristow8411|Bristow8411]] ([[User talk:Bristow8411|talk]]) 17:56, 22 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:From that promo image it appears that at least Taylor is carrying a Glock 22 (contrary to the dialogue you quoted), and in other caps &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Bristow Nope, this is a cap from the exact point where he says &amp;quot;This is the department issue sidearm, Glock 19.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
http://i.minus.com/ibaxvcTJVzqYVG.jpg You can clearly see the markings noting it as a 22 in .40SW [[User:Scarecrow|scarecrow]] ([[User talk:Scarecrow|talk]]) 10:50, 24 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zavala has a full length Glock so if it was a 9x19mm it would be a Glock 17.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 18:01, 22 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well it wouldn't be the first time what was on the script and what is actually used on the screen is different. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] ([[User talk:Excalibur01|talk]]) 20:18, 25 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Once again, you guys are over-analyzing too much. The explanation is very simple: The script called for Glock 19s, but the property master/armor chose to bring Glock 22s to the set, and nobody bothered to correct the actors on the inconsistency. It happens all the time (the classic example that comes to mind is ''[[Kiss the Girls]]'', where the film's antagonist calls Alex Cross's sidearm a Glock because the script dialogue was taken straight from the book, even though the gun actually used in the movie is a SIG 226). -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008|talk]]) 11:03, 24 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just watched the movie last night. Even when Taylor is holding the gun and describing it as a &amp;quot;Glock 19&amp;quot;, you can clearly see that the weapon says &amp;quot;22&amp;quot; on the slide. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008|talk]]) 15:47, 13 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Found some caps on a forum ==&lt;br /&gt;
Thought I would direct you to them. Perhaps somebody can ID the AR15?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Revolver: http://i.imgur.com/vhC5i.png&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AR15: http://i.imgur.com/3cAEC.png http://i.imgur.com/KLGXT.png http://i.imgur.com/fA8Te.png http://i.imgur.com/GbLnH.png [[User:Innawoods|Innawoods]] ([[User talk:Innawoods|talk]]) 16:45, 30 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The revolver is a Smith &amp;amp; Wesson 642 as shown on the main page, but apart from spotting the EoTech sight and what I think is a Magpul stock on the AR I have no idea --[[User:Taurus96|Taurus96]] ([[User talk:Taurus96|talk]]) 04:42, 31 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EoWGlock22FP.jpg|thumb|600px|none|The Glock 22 in the officer's POV.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Detective sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone identify the sidearms of the homicide detectives? (Noahrussell007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cartel 1911s ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know it wasn't shown or mentioned in the movie, but being Mexican cartels, wouldn't the 1911s be more likely chambered in 38 super than 9mm? Hard to tell the distance of the mag channel from the back of the magazine.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Mechanic_(2011)&amp;diff=421756</id>
		<title>Talk:The Mechanic (2011)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Mechanic_(2011)&amp;diff=421756"/>
		<updated>2011-05-24T10:22:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* Magic 1911? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Unidentified Weapons==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thug threatens McKenna with a pistol before being subdued. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mechanic-pistol-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mechanic-pistol-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SeecampLWS-32.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Seecamp LWS-32 .32 ACP. my best guess [[user:simmons 8492|simmons 8492]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like an NAA Guardian to me. (Gunmaster45, not signed in.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== McKenna's 1911 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it me or does it look like the 1911 McKenna is using is the engraved one that is used in Supernatural and Machette? --[[User:Cool-breeze|cool-breeze]] 01:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's similiar, but both of the ones you mentioned are heavily engraved, especially De Niro's. The pistol from this film just has a phrase on either side of the slide. [[User:mmarlon brando|mmarlon brando]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==hitmen in movies==&lt;br /&gt;
in this version it look like there assanations are the run in and shoot the place to pieces. is the original he tried to make it look like an an accident first&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well they only show three hits . the one in the pool , which is totaly ninja , the one where the gas station blows, an accident and then the all out brawl in the street , and being that they killed his mentor and father, i would hit em hard also . and being that they are aware of the hitmans presence , the sneek atack isnt an option. [[User: Simmons 8492|simmons 8492]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==THIS MOVIE==&lt;br /&gt;
is gonna be total crap, I promise. --[[User:ZeoRanger5|ZeoRanger5]] 18:17, 13 December 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Impossible, it stars Jason Statham. --[[User:Sentient6|Sentient6]] 11:59, 12 January 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This movie... was not crap. [[User:humanzie3|humanzie3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Barrett==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Ben Foster]] is the one firing it right.[[User:simmons 8492|simmons 8492]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yup, he decimates a cinder block in short order. [[User:mmarlon brando|mmarlon brando]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ooopsie!  Watch close the slo-mo on the case ejection in the movie - right near the frame grab used.  Crimped closed case necks.  BLANKS.&lt;br /&gt;
No cinder blocks were actually shot in the making of this movie.  :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Couch Gun==&lt;br /&gt;
For those who've seen the movie, at one point a character draws a pistol from the inside of a couch. Anyone catch what it was? It was lightning fast, but I'm thinking Glock 19. Hopefully someone can confirm. [[User:mmarlon brando|mmarlon brando]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought it was a SIG, id say 226 or 228 as I think i remember it having a hammer, dont quote me on that tho --[[User:Captain Snikt|Captain Snikt]] 22:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magic 1911? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just saw this movie again today, and I'm almost positive it turns from an Auto Ordinance 1911 when shot by Harry at his van to a Springfield armory 1911 when we see the close up at the end of the movie.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AlexoftheYear|AlexoftheYear]] 06:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
** After seeing the movie, the gun is a beautiful all chrome 1911A1, however, it does not have all the fancy scroll work engraving on it. The handgun is smooth finish with a Latin phrase on one side and the English translation &amp;quot;Victory Loves Preparation&amp;quot; on the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- just saw the movie, i did see the auto ordnance marking, but did not see the springfield armory version --[[User:Jan|Jan]] 05:22, 24 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Scope on FN F2000 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what recent revisions would imply, there is nothing to suggest that the Leupold Mark 4 CQ/T would ever function properly if mounted backwards.  The FN F2000 uses a universal top rail, and it was clearly a glaring mistake on the part of the Armorer or prop department, and not mounted on backwards to &amp;quot;fit this particular FN.&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Lock_%27n_Load_With_R._Lee_Ermey&amp;diff=334330</id>
		<title>Talk:Lock 'n Load With R. Lee Ermey</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Lock_%27n_Load_With_R._Lee_Ermey&amp;diff=334330"/>
		<updated>2010-09-27T01:11:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* The Gold Cup? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This on the run documentation is kicking my ass. My internet crapped for a second too, which was very inconveniant. Commercials help much for me. Episode one is almost done, then I do Episode two. Then after I finish, I'll give the page proper formating touch ups. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I guess episode two is ALL field artillery, which I don't document. I don't know it well enough anyway. I'll rewatch episode 1 at 1:00 to double check my work. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have the first episode of Lock N Load, but I like to tell you Gunmaster that if you see 5 M16A1 throughout this series, you put all the caps in on section not make 5 different sections like you did for Mail Call. I was looking through that and I lost count how many times I saw M1 Garand. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 04:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will definately buy this on DVD whenever. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== It's The KING!!!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say hello to the king of imfdb. See Right now Mail Call is on 98 It's been two episodes and it's already half way to beating that 3 more episodes and it could be the king. [[User:Drjuki|Drjuki]] 18:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well it is a show pretty much about just gun and other munitions-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 01:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Mail Call's not really on 98 since I repeated lots of guns in seasons, so in reality this show's probably beat it by now anyway. But this show is all guns anyway, so it's no surprise. It was foolish of me to ever make a competition out of page making, so let's stop that king crap right now. I'll scour the Earth for this show on DVD though, I really wouldn't mind doing it. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Alright, when I have a LOT of time, I'll do the caps. I have all the episodes SO FAR! [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 05:06, 24 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An update on what I want to do here. I have the latest episode, but I'm just being a bit lazy to cap all of them. It's a lot of guns. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 17:13, 17 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Glock 18C==&lt;br /&gt;
: When they show the Glock 18C shooting in slo-mo, it looks like its about to fall apart in Gunny's hand-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 01:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hater...LOL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rearrange category==&lt;br /&gt;
Rearrange page to categorize by type of gun?  Or keep it the way it is? [[User: Ben41]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If someone has the patience to do that, go ahead. I've had to rewatch 3 episodes of the Gunny loving the sound of his voice to get these caps. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 02:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Gold Cup?==&lt;br /&gt;
:I know it says there was a box showing the name of the gun. But I cannot see said box in the screencaps. So I am wondering how it was identified as such. Just going form what's in the 'cap, it's lacking the sight rib (characteristic of the Gold Cup), has aftermarket trigger, rear sight, and has forward side serrations, ambidextrous safety, and lacks the guide rod under the barrel. Not saying it isn't possible those are mods done to a Gold Cup, but going from what's in the cap I couldn't positively Identify it as such. Not saying anyone's wrong, but it defeats the purpose if you say there's a box identifying the gun if you don't show the box don't you think?[[User:RedJedRevolver|RedJedRevolver]] 22:26, 24 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, looks alot like a Kimber Custom II to me - [[User:Nyles|Nyles]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Actually, it looks more like a new model MEU-SOC&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.berryhillguns.com/images/stories/meusoc_new/meusoc5.jpg --[[User:Jan|Jan]] 01:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Mossberg==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I took the liberty of editing it. It was originally classified as 500. A decent look at the mag tube end-cap shows it's a 590.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In all fairness, I'm sure this page was exhausting to set up though. But no one can do it all, so I try to help where I can. Great job on the page in any case. ;) [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 03:59, 17 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone happen to have any good stills of the rings Mike Tristano wears while he's on the show?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1 Garand Picture ==&lt;br /&gt;
Just thought I should let everyone know I changed the picture of the M1 Garand because R. Lee Ermey definately didn't use a Tanker Garand. Feel free to change it back if necessary. Chris_Hun7er 02:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't see how it's a Tanker Garand. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not, that's why I changed the picture... The previous picture showed a T26 Tanker Garand while R. Lee Ermey used a full-sized Garand in the show. Chris_Hun7er 05:33, 30 April 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How do you mistaken a full length Garand with a the shorter variant? I would think they should have implemented the shorter variant to the military during WWII because the full length is heavy as hell. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Lock_%27n_Load_With_R._Lee_Ermey&amp;diff=334328</id>
		<title>Talk:Lock 'n Load With R. Lee Ermey</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Lock_%27n_Load_With_R._Lee_Ermey&amp;diff=334328"/>
		<updated>2010-09-27T01:04:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* The Gold Cup? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This on the run documentation is kicking my ass. My internet crapped for a second too, which was very inconveniant. Commercials help much for me. Episode one is almost done, then I do Episode two. Then after I finish, I'll give the page proper formating touch ups. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I guess episode two is ALL field artillery, which I don't document. I don't know it well enough anyway. I'll rewatch episode 1 at 1:00 to double check my work. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have the first episode of Lock N Load, but I like to tell you Gunmaster that if you see 5 M16A1 throughout this series, you put all the caps in on section not make 5 different sections like you did for Mail Call. I was looking through that and I lost count how many times I saw M1 Garand. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 04:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will definately buy this on DVD whenever. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== It's The KING!!!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say hello to the king of imfdb. See Right now Mail Call is on 98 It's been two episodes and it's already half way to beating that 3 more episodes and it could be the king. [[User:Drjuki|Drjuki]] 18:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well it is a show pretty much about just gun and other munitions-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 01:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Mail Call's not really on 98 since I repeated lots of guns in seasons, so in reality this show's probably beat it by now anyway. But this show is all guns anyway, so it's no surprise. It was foolish of me to ever make a competition out of page making, so let's stop that king crap right now. I'll scour the Earth for this show on DVD though, I really wouldn't mind doing it. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Alright, when I have a LOT of time, I'll do the caps. I have all the episodes SO FAR! [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 05:06, 24 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An update on what I want to do here. I have the latest episode, but I'm just being a bit lazy to cap all of them. It's a lot of guns. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 17:13, 17 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Glock 18C==&lt;br /&gt;
: When they show the Glock 18C shooting in slo-mo, it looks like its about to fall apart in Gunny's hand-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 01:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hater...LOL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rearrange category==&lt;br /&gt;
Rearrange page to categorize by type of gun?  Or keep it the way it is? [[User: Ben41]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If someone has the patience to do that, go ahead. I've had to rewatch 3 episodes of the Gunny loving the sound of his voice to get these caps. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 02:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Gold Cup?==&lt;br /&gt;
:I know it says there was a box showing the name of the gun. But I cannot see said box in the screencaps. So I am wondering how it was identified as such. Just going form what's in the 'cap, it's lacking the sight rib (characteristic of the Gold Cup), has aftermarket trigger, rear sight, and has forward side serrations, ambidextrous safety, and lacks the guide rod under the barrel. Not saying it isn't possible those are mods done to a Gold Cup, but going from what's in the cap I couldn't positively Identify it as such. Not saying anyone's wrong, but it defeats the purpose if you say there's a box identifying the gun if you don't show the box don't you think?[[User:RedJedRevolver|RedJedRevolver]] 22:26, 24 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, looks alot like a Kimber Custom II to me - [[User:Nyles|Nyles]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Actually, it looks more like a new model MEU-SOC --[[User:Jan|Jan]] 01:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Mossberg==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I took the liberty of editing it. It was originally classified as 500. A decent look at the mag tube end-cap shows it's a 590.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In all fairness, I'm sure this page was exhausting to set up though. But no one can do it all, so I try to help where I can. Great job on the page in any case. ;) [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 03:59, 17 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone happen to have any good stills of the rings Mike Tristano wears while he's on the show?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1 Garand Picture ==&lt;br /&gt;
Just thought I should let everyone know I changed the picture of the M1 Garand because R. Lee Ermey definately didn't use a Tanker Garand. Feel free to change it back if necessary. Chris_Hun7er 02:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't see how it's a Tanker Garand. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not, that's why I changed the picture... The previous picture showed a T26 Tanker Garand while R. Lee Ermey used a full-sized Garand in the show. Chris_Hun7er 05:33, 30 April 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How do you mistaken a full length Garand with a the shorter variant? I would think they should have implemented the shorter variant to the military during WWII because the full length is heavy as hell. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Underworld_(2003)&amp;diff=294973</id>
		<title>Talk:Underworld (2003)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Underworld_(2003)&amp;diff=294973"/>
		<updated>2010-07-01T23:43:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* Modified Beretta 92FS */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== M16A2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pistol grip on the M16 appears to be lacking the finger notch which is on the A2 but not on the A1. It is difficult to be certain from the picture. This could be an A1 with A2-style handguards. Does anyone know for certain?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's not an M16A2. The upper seems to have no forward assist, so that means it's an M16A1 upper. The lower is an SP1-style lower. It's just like this gun:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:M16A1 SP1 A2.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Colt AR-15 Sporter-1 (SP1) with M16A2 hand guards 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:-[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 05:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Full auto P99s ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't remember those P99s being full autos. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 04:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Modified Beretta 92FS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, are the compensators attached to Selene's Beretta 92FS are real world compensator or were the designed specifically for the film? 29 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
dose Selene had two Beretta 92FS, two P99s, and a USP conpact on her at all times?&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think so. It's been awhile since I've seen the movie, but IIRC, she carried the Berettas for the first part of the movie, then switched to the Walthers once they started using the silver nitrate rounds. And she never used the USP in combat, she only used it at the mansion firing range, which being part of the mansion armory, has multiple weapons available. Guessing she just picked it up &amp;quot;in house&amp;quot; for her target shooting, it doesn't appear to be anything she carries with her regularly. [[User:DKS01|DKS01]] 05:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selene's Berettas do not seem to have real compensators like in Evolution, but more like covers for the extended barrels.  There are no ports on top of the &amp;quot;covers&amp;quot; and the still showing Selene firing, only muzzle flash is seen and no flash upwards as with a normal compensator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, she does use the P99s in combat, in the end when the vampires attack the lycan hideout.  You can clearly see them when she jumps down the tunnel, and when she does a forward flip while shooting a lycan. --[[User:Jan|Jan]] 23:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Jonah_Hex&amp;diff=282665</id>
		<title>Talk:Jonah Hex</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Jonah_Hex&amp;diff=282665"/>
		<updated>2010-06-05T19:11:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* NEW ARMY REVOLVER */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Chit Chat ==&lt;br /&gt;
You think we could cut down on the personal interjections in the picture captions? Your withering disdain for Hollywood's lack of regard for Newton's laws is cute and all, but it adds nothing to the article than to characterize the contributors of this site as bitter douches.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Toadvine|Toadvine]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes! Please note also, that snarky commentary in descriptions OR picture captions is''' against IMFDB rules'''.  ''(Read the Rules page folks).''  And members are well within their rights to re-write / edit caustic and sarcastic commentary on IMFDB.  [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 02:41, 1 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gatling guns ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gatling guns mounted on the horse? Really? I mean I know that it's a fantasy western, but come on. Oh well. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 15:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know this is based on a comic book, right? --[[User:John Ryder|John Ryder]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes I know. I was reading the comic book back in the seventies when I was a kid and I don't recall dual Gatling Guns mounted on a horse. Also note that I did aknowledge that it's a Fantasy Western. Still doesn't change the fact that I find horse mounted Gatling Guns to be stupid. Reminds me of [[Will Smith|Will Smith's]] ''[[Wild Wild West]]''.--[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 17:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They mounted the short barrel 1874 Gatling gun on camels, with special mounts. Rob the Fiend&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes they did, but the set-up in the movie is ridiculous. Sorry, but like I stated in an earlier post, I read the comic book back in the seventies and I remember a fairly straight forward western comic book. Without all the silliness like a horse with dual mounted Gatlings. I guess times change, but I still think it's stupid. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 15:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
some of the ideas in Fantasy western feeling like there modern ideas using old tech. like the magazine fed crossbows that shoot sticks of dynamite are like grenade launcher/rocket launchers. or Gatling as machine guns. but I don't think stick of dynamite would fly very far or straight. also using two gating guns to kill 8 men seem over the tip. it might be cheaper just to use his colts single action army's&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
why in western do the bad  @#!*%  shoot everyone that insults them?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot; I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted&amp;quot;- John Wayne in one of his films. In the Duke can, so can you.--[[User:Mandolin|Mandolin]] 02:50, 1 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is from &amp;quot;The Shootist&amp;quot;:  I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them.   David.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wall of Guns ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a Nock Gun hanging right behind Jonah's head, or is it some kind of fictional gatling rifle? Paul_Baeumer 30.04.2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strange as it may be, it actually looks like a Sharps carbine shoved into some sort of sleeve with extra barrels on it. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Toadvine|Toadvine]] 02:44, 1 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree looks like the barrel cluster of a Nock gun but the receiver looks closer to that of a Sharps rifle of some sort. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 08:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NEW ARMY REVOLVER ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Didn't see one on the main page, but Jonah is holding a Remington New Army on the movie poster. Don't know if that is going to be in the movie. --[[User:Jan|Jan]] 19:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:3:10_to_Yuma_(2007)&amp;diff=280974</id>
		<title>Talk:3:10 to Yuma (2007)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:3:10_to_Yuma_(2007)&amp;diff=280974"/>
		<updated>2010-06-02T07:47:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm kind of dissapointed that neither Thell Reed or William Ghormley ever responded to my E-Mails. Reed's webiste manager even said he'd show him my message, but I never got a response. Eh, what can you do? - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
::That's what you get for talking to armorers... ;) [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Heh, right. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unknown pistol with the lanyard ring from one of the deputies in Contention could be this 1890 SA http://www.cimarron-firearms.com/Specialty/1875Outlaw-Model1890.htm&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=254986</id>
		<title>Talk:The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=254986"/>
		<updated>2010-04-05T17:50:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* LDA? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;unknown guns:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The litlle .22 looks like a jennings j-22 and the revolver looks like it may be a ruger redhawk, anyone got a close up of the hammer, that gives away rugers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-k9870&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those who haven't seen it yet, the movie's recently-released trailer (which is the source of our page's info) is here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if2-PYxgL50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it'll follow completely in the vein of its predecessor - totally mindless and full of self-inflated importance, but impossible not to enjoy.  Only thing that bothers me is that Sean Patrick Flannery has really not aged too well - dude's got an obvious double-chin in the trailer.  That, and the fact that I would have preferred to see them using FN Five-Sevens instead of Desert Eagles. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 13:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just watched the trailer. Looks great!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does look awesome. Norman Reedus on the other hand doesn't look like he has aged more than a year or too. I hope it will be better than the first, but it won't be the same with out Willem Dafoe -[[User:Mythekal|Mythekal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm a BIG fan of the original movie (plus I'm a Roman Catholic, have Irish heritage, and was born a fraternal twin, but my twin died during childbirth). We don't only get Sean, Norman, and Billy back, but we get Clifton Collins Jr. as thier dumbass sidekick and Julie Benz as the FBI agent (who looks like an attractive female version of Willem Dafoe). Personally, I think the brothers should use M1911A1 pistols with engraved finishes and white grips that have the Celtic Cross on it. - [[User:Swordfish941|Swordfish941]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=I agree. Having them upgrade from Beretta's to M1911's is like chucking a .25 Saturday Night Special for a Les Baer custom-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 03:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Don't underestimate what a 9mm can do. Especially the beretta 92FS. That gun is a refined killer as is the M1911 series. A man's just as dead with a 9mm slug in his brain as three .45 slugs in his chest. I think they should use .455 WEBLEYS! Those guns are fuckin' BEAUTIFUL! Engrave THEM grips! And desert eagles? please. what are they trying to prove? Don't get me wrong. I got irish heritage too and am AMPED to see this movie...but seriously...desert eagles? But yes. engraved finish M1911A1s would kick an intense amount of ass. Especially if they were mag-na-ported like in Face/off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would rather shoot someone once in the chest with a .45 than the 3-5 rounds of 9x19mm it would take. Webleys would be ridiculous though, as I have never even seen any .455 ammo for sale except for ONCE, and it was $80 for 20 rounds-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 20:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The local Cabelas sells 455 Webley in boxes of twenty cartridges made by Hornady for about $40.00. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 03:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::C'mon man. don't be that way. The .45 would stop a man in his tracks in under three shots though. Everybodys got a gun thats THEIR GUN. Be it a Beretta 92fs or an m1911. The brothers seems pretty effective with them. why should they change? Some men can dot an eye with either gun. proficiency can be much more of a decider in combat than stopping power. A professional with a beretta is much more dangerous than an untrained person with a M1911, and vice versa. I have known those that swear by either gun. It just annoys me that it has become a ritual to scorn the 9X19mm round due to it's supposed lack of lethality. And I doubt you have been shot with either round. If you have I apologize. I suggested Webleys because they are very nice looking guns in my opinion. Note how I said LOOKING. Besides they are using desert eagles with compensators so money seems to be no object to them on their quest for justice, besides they could just reload their empties like everyone else with a webley.&lt;br /&gt;
::Please my friend, sign your posts by pressing the sign button on the edit menu.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 14:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Let me put it this way: I know people who have had to shoot people with 9mm's in self defense. They all told me it took around 3 rounds to make the attacker stop. Also, a Beretta Cougar makes way more sense to me than a 92 due to the fact that the Cougar actually feels like a gun, unlike the Beretta 92 which feels like a toy-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 18:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Who gives a flying fuck if a gun feels like a toy? I actually would like a gun that felt like a toy. That way it wouldn't be heavy. Also, three bullets isn't much. I still prefer .45 ACP, though.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::yeah sorry folks. guess i sorta overreacted 'bout that one. I have found in my experience using a Beretta 92G vertec and a caspian arms M1911 that guns in either caliber can be fine guns. I would be fine using either of the guns I just mentioned in a firefight, or both preferebly. I don't mean like john wooing the guns, I mean like having a spare rod. hell, i'd use a browning HP, or a tokarev, or S&amp;amp;W Model 10, or a 1911, or a H&amp;amp;k U.S.P. .45, or even (god forbid) a glock. A gun's a gun and a kill's a kill. whatever you can kill with, use it. Jeff Cooper swore by his 1911s, just as my father swears by his 586. I knew a man who was mocked for carrying a Star model B when was in the armed forces, but easily shot a man dead in self-defense. .45 = stopping power. 9mm =low recoil. just because a man uses a beretta doesnt mean he likes to spray and pray, maybe he just doesn't like to take the chance he'll be out when he doesnt want to be, just like a man who carries an m1911 isnt necesarily a guy who just wants what's biggest, maybe he just knows what it can do. a man likes what he likes. And I like sammiches and berettas. And webleys. besides they could just use webleys modified to take .45 acp that they can download to usable pressures. Yes folks. I just went back to square one there....still. webley = sexy. well...im sure this argument will go on for eternity....soo continue. And thanks for tellin me about the signature thing. --[[User:ConditionNone|ConditionNone]] 19:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are Webley's in the movie, but they aren't used that much-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 05:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you think a Beretta feels like a toy, you are either enormously obese or you have never shot/held one.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 23:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have held quite few  and I am not obese (I'm a big guy, but not enormous), but I do have massive hands, which explains why I think it feels like a toy and why I prefer heavier weapons. For example, I do not think a Ruger Redhawk w/ a scope is that heavy while everyone else I know who have shot it bitch about how heavy it is-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 01:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey S&amp;amp;Wshooter, didn't mean to come off as an asshole on that last comment. I had a bad day and was kind of angry.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 00:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be fair both the 9mm and 45 ACP are probably the best rounds when using a suppressor. The .45 is naturally a subsonic round while the 147 grain 9mm round lends itself well to use in a suppressed firearm. As for anecdotal evidence on number of rounds there are a good number of stories where a 9mm was as effective as a .45 and there are stories where it took more than one round of .45 to stop an attacker. I happen to like the Beretta 92FS as a firearm and I have never had it jam except after a 1000 round torture test and had a 1911 do the same. Either way with a suppressed Beretta or 1911 the McManus brothers would have had a reliable pistol with which a suppressor would work admirably and would be quite effective. [[Special:Contributions/98.175.58.228|98.175.58.228]] 04:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two things I would like to point out. First of all, Beretta 92s and their variants are known for being heavier guns, since all of them up until 2003 were completely metal, as opposed to the polymer that is now commonly used in many parts of other guns. Even after '03, they were still most metal, and therefore are still quite heavy, compared to most other commercial guns. The second point I wanted to make is mainly directed at the power of the 9x19mm round, versus the power of the .45 ACP round. Sure, the .45 has plenty of stopping power, but the 9mm isn't a weak round. It may take 3-5 rounds to the chest occasionally, but more important then the stopping power of a bullet is where it hits. The .45 has been recorded to take as many as five hits to the chest to kill, while there are multiple incidents of the nine-mil killing in one shot straight through the heart. Sure, stopping power is important, but becomes fairly irrelevant if you're not trying to keep the target alive, and if you actually know how to aim. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 06:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I recently ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
watched the trailer and there's a scene where Billy Connely and a thug face off and the thug is holding a revolver (Ruger Blackhawk maybe?)-[[User:Shooter|Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think they were webley's&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just saw the movie, and those are definitely Webleys. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 08:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the Glock 30 or I guess possibly the 26/27 not on the gun page?  II Duke has one on his left hand shoulder when he has his six guns strapped to him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not to mention the Para Nite Tac (according to movie armorer), S&amp;amp;W 686 &amp;amp; 629.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LDA? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly don't think Romeo is using LDAs as evident by the full triggers.  They still may be Para-Ordnance, and I really like the Italian flag grips though. -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One of the armorers who worked on the movie told me that they were LDAs.  I wouldn't have written it otherwise. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 15:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wasn't he flag on the grips the Mexican flag, not the Italian one?-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 19:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  Not trying to be a prick here, but armorers can be wrong all the time.  Look at Hitman, or in the 1st Boondock Saints movie where the 92FS's transforms to PT92's.  Either way I am by no means an expert, if he's a professional movie armorer than who am I to contradict him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::'''''&amp;quot;but armorers can be wrong all the time&amp;quot;'''''? hahahaha.  Yes, they can be wrong ALL the time, but if they were, they wouldn't get much work now, would they? LOL [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 23:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.  I liked the grips eitherway.  -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as a quick note to anyone looking, these dont look like LDAs, they have the standard 1911 style SA skeleton trigger, I'm not sure if that trigger can be used in a double action pistol. Therefore My vote is that these are Para p-18s, especially since it's the same trigger used on the P-18s -Deadlysyn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BDS2-9.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Romeo ([[Clifton Collins, Jr.]]) racks the slide of his custom 45 - note that the words &amp;quot;El Jefe&amp;quot; are engraved in the slide - .45 acp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah they have SA triggers. Maybe they were converted to SA? Is that possible? --[[User:Predator20|Predator20]] 19:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe the armorer meant Agent Bloom's weapon was the LDA. Just watched special features and that's what I heard him say. - JanG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.para-usa.com/new/images/product_large/PCX745Sphoto_big.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
Closest Para I could find, based on serration angle and spacing, and the sights. Only problem, the LTC is a commander length and the ones Romeo uses look like government length. Another possibility is the PXT or the gun rights special edition. Kinda cool to use a gun rights pistol in a movie where fire fights are the appeal. --[[User:Jan|Jan]] 08:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Did the armorer (whichever one is interviewed for the special features) mention if Romeo's guns were P14s or LDAs?  Al Vrkljan, who was ''one'' of the armorers who worked on the movie, specifically told me LDA, but he may have mis-remembered.  I'm guessing that Charles Taylor (the other of the two armorers, and Al's boss) is the guy they interviewed for the special features, and he might have said something else. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Taylor, Romeo's pistols are custom made for the character. They kinda looked like Para PXTs to me, but without the front serrations like the special series. Also, when the armorer showed Agent Bloom's handgun 6.45 can be seen clearly on the side. Here's one that looks like it...&lt;br /&gt;
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y286/5Wire/Firearms/645R.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:26, 24 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Do they ever mention on the DVD special features the guns that Noah Macmanus uses in the finale? I can't tell what model that subcompact Para is (could be a P-10 but I'm not sure; confirmation would help.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would whoever is identifying Romeo's pistols please make note: '''The pistols in the movie CLEARLY do not have flared grip frames meaning they CANNOT be double stack pistols.'''  The guns are neither double action or high capacity.[[User:Captain America]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe its this gun: http://www.para-usa.com/new/product_pistol.php?id=62 -[[User:Gunman69|Gunman69]] 03:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Noah's compact 1911 is a Para Nite Tac. As for Romeo's pistols, I had mentioned they looked like PXT Special series but with different fron sights. Maybe they're made up of several different parts put together. In any case, I agree with Captain... single stack, single action 1911s. --[[User:Jan|Jan]] 17:50, 5 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN FAL ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just saw the movie myself and am pretty sure those were not FN Fals in the armourer's cage but some type of assault shotgun with a side folding stock. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 13:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::FAL with no magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crew Cut ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hitman adversary is listed as using H&amp;amp;K USPs, but according to the armorer in special features, he uses Sig P226s. Also in the bar shootout where he takes the bartender hostage, you can clearly see that is is a Sig.  -  Jan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did the armorer say whether Crew Cut used the P226R in the church scene, or only the bar shootout, or both?  He definitely uses the P226R in the bar, but I wasn't able to tell what the suppressed pistols were.  I'm getting the Blu Ray of this movie pretty soon (I ordered it from Amazon), so hopefully I'll be able to tell once I get it. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They looked like 226s in the church scene, especially when crew cut laid down next to the priest.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watched special features again and according to the movie armorer (Charles Taylor) crew cut uses 2 sig 226s.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt Model 1908 Vest Pocket ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comparing the side view of both the Colt and the gun in the movie, it doesn't look quite like a 1908. Look for closely at the trigger [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps you are right. Any thoughts on what it might be, though? -[[User:Gunman69|Gunman69]] 03:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=249357</id>
		<title>Talk:The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=249357"/>
		<updated>2010-03-24T07:26:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* LDA? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;For those who haven't seen it yet, the movie's recently-released trailer (which is the source of our page's info) is here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if2-PYxgL50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it'll follow completely in the vein of its predecessor - totally mindless and full of self-inflated importance, but impossible not to enjoy.  Only thing that bothers me is that Sean Patrick Flannery has really not aged too well - dude's got an obvious double-chin in the trailer.  That, and the fact that I would have preferred to see them using FN Five-Sevens instead of Desert Eagles. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 13:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just watched the trailer. Looks great!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does look awesome. Norman Reedus on the other hand doesn't look like he has aged more than a year or too. I hope it will be better than the first, but it won't be the same with out Willem Dafoe -[[User:Mythekal|Mythekal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm a BIG fan of the original movie (plus I'm a Roman Catholic, have Irish heritage, and was born a fraternal twin, but my twin died during childbirth). We don't only get Sean, Norman, and Billy back, but we get Clifton Collins Jr. as thier dumbass sidekick and Julie Benz as the FBI agent (who looks like an attractive female version of Willem Dafoe). Personally, I think the brothers should use M1911A1 pistols with engraved finishes and white grips that have the Celtic Cross on it. - [[User:Swordfish941|Swordfish941]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=I agree. Having them upgrade from Beretta's to M1911's is like chucking a .25 Saturday Night Special for a Les Baer custom-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 03:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Don't underestimate what a 9mm can do. Especially the beretta 92FS. That gun is a refined killer as is the M1911 series. A man's just as dead with a 9mm slug in his brain as three .45 slugs in his chest. I think they should use .455 WEBLEYS! Those guns are fuckin' BEAUTIFUL! Engrave THEM grips! And desert eagles? please. what are they trying to prove? Don't get me wrong. I got irish heritage too and am AMPED to see this movie...but seriously...desert eagles? But yes. engraved finish M1911A1s would kick an intense amount of ass. Especially if they were mag-na-ported like in Face/off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would rather shoot someone once in the chest with a .45 than the 3-5 rounds of 9x19mm it would take. Webleys would be ridiculous though, as I have never even seen any .455 ammo for sale except for ONCE, and it was $80 for 20 rounds-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 20:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The local Cabelas sells 455 Webley in boxes of twenty cartridges made by Hornady for about $40.00. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 03:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::C'mon man. don't be that way. The .45 would stop a man in his tracks in under three shots though. Everybodys got a gun thats THEIR GUN. Be it a Beretta 92fs or an m1911. The brothers seems pretty effective with them. why should they change? Some men can dot an eye with either gun. proficiency can be much more of a decider in combat than stopping power. A professional with a beretta is much more dangerous than an untrained person with a M1911, and vice versa. I have known those that swear by either gun. It just annoys me that it has become a ritual to scorn the 9X19mm round due to it's supposed lack of lethality. And I doubt you have been shot with either round. If you have I apologize. I suggested Webleys because they are very nice looking guns in my opinion. Note how I said LOOKING. Besides they are using desert eagles with compensators so money seems to be no object to them on their quest for justice, besides they could just reload their empties like everyone else with a webley.&lt;br /&gt;
::Please my friend, sign your posts by pressing the sign button on the edit menu.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 14:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Let me put it this way: I know people who have had to shoot people with 9mm's in self defense. They all told me it took around 3 rounds to make the attacker stop. Also, a Beretta Cougar makes way more sense to me than a 92 due to the fact that the Cougar actually feels like a gun, unlike the Beretta 92 which feels like a toy-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 18:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Who gives a flying fuck if a gun feels like a toy? I actually would like a gun that felt like a toy. That way it wouldn't be heavy. Also, three bullets isn't much. I still prefer .45 ACP, though.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::yeah sorry folks. guess i sorta overreacted 'bout that one. I have found in my experience using a Beretta 92G vertec and a caspian arms M1911 that guns in either caliber can be fine guns. I would be fine using either of the guns I just mentioned in a firefight, or both preferebly. I don't mean like john wooing the guns, I mean like having a spare rod. hell, i'd use a browning HP, or a tokarev, or S&amp;amp;W Model 10, or a 1911, or a H&amp;amp;k U.S.P. .45, or even (god forbid) a glock. A gun's a gun and a kill's a kill. whatever you can kill with, use it. Jeff Cooper swore by his 1911s, just as my father swears by his 586. I knew a man who was mocked for carrying a Star model B when was in the armed forces, but easily shot a man dead in self-defense. .45 = stopping power. 9mm =low recoil. just because a man uses a beretta doesnt mean he likes to spray and pray, maybe he just doesn't like to take the chance he'll be out when he doesnt want to be, just like a man who carries an m1911 isnt necesarily a guy who just wants what's biggest, maybe he just knows what it can do. a man likes what he likes. And I like sammiches and berettas. And webleys. besides they could just use webleys modified to take .45 acp that they can download to usable pressures. Yes folks. I just went back to square one there....still. webley = sexy. well...im sure this argument will go on for eternity....soo continue. And thanks for tellin me about the signature thing. --[[User:ConditionNone|ConditionNone]] 19:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are Webley's in the movie, but they aren't used that much-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 05:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you think a Beretta feels like a toy, you are either enormously obese or you have never shot/held one.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 23:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have held quite few  and I am not obese (I'm a big guy, but not enormous), but I do have massive hands, which explains why I think it feels like a toy and why I prefer heavier weapons. For example, I do not think a Ruger Redhawk w/ a scope is that heavy while everyone else I know who have shot it bitch about how heavy it is-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 01:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey S&amp;amp;Wshooter, didn't mean to come off as an asshole on that last comment. I had a bad day and was kind of angry.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 00:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be fair both the 9mm and 45 ACP are probably the best rounds when using a suppressor. The .45 is naturally a subsonic round while the 147 grain 9mm round lends itself well to use in a suppressed firearm. As for anecdotal evidence on number of rounds there are a good number of stories where a 9mm was as effective as a .45 and there are stories where it took more than one round of .45 to stop an attacker. I happen to like the Beretta 92FS as a firearm and I have never had it jam except after a 1000 round torture test and had a 1911 do the same. Either way with a suppressed Beretta or 1911 the McManus brothers would have had a reliable pistol with which a suppressor would work admirably and would be quite effective. [[Special:Contributions/98.175.58.228|98.175.58.228]] 04:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two things I would like to point out. First of all, Beretta 92s and their variants are known for being heavier guns, since all of them up until 2003 were completely metal, as opposed to the polymer that is now commonly used in many parts of other guns. Even after '03, they were still most metal, and therefore are still quite heavy, compared to most other commercial guns. The second point I wanted to make is mainly directed at the power of the 9x19mm round, versus the power of the .45 ACP round. Sure, the .45 has plenty of stopping power, but the 9mm isn't a weak round. It may take 3-5 rounds to the chest occasionally, but more important then the stopping power of a bullet is where it hits. The .45 has been recorded to take as many as five hits to the chest to kill, while there are multiple incidents of the nine-mil killing in one shot straight through the heart. Sure, stopping power is important, but becomes fairly irrelevant if you're not trying to keep the target alive, and if you actually know how to aim. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 06:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I recently ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
watched the trailer and there's a scene where Billy Connely and a thug face off and the thug is holding a revolver (Ruger Blackhawk maybe?)-[[User:Shooter|Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think they were webley's&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just saw the movie, and those are definitely Webleys. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 08:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the Glock 30 or I guess possibly the 26/27 not on the gun page?  II Duke has one on his left hand shoulder when he has his six guns strapped to him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not to mention the Para Nite Tac (according to movie armorer), S&amp;amp;W 686 &amp;amp; 629.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LDA? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly don't think Romeo is using LDAs as evident by the full triggers.  They still may be Para-Ordnance, and I really like the Italian flag grips though. -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One of the armorers who worked on the movie told me that they were LDAs.  I wouldn't have written it otherwise. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 15:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wasn't he flag on the grips the Mexican flag, not the Italian one?-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 19:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  Not trying to be a prick here, but armorers can be wrong all the time.  Look at Hitman, or in the 1st Boondock Saints movie where the 92FS's transforms to PT92's.  Either way I am by no means an expert, if he's a professional movie armorer than who am I to contradict him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::'''''&amp;quot;but armorers can be wrong all the time&amp;quot;'''''? hahahaha.  Yes, they can be wrong ALL the time, but if they were, they wouldn't get much work now, would they? LOL [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 23:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.  I liked the grips eitherway.  -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as a quick note to anyone looking, these dont look like LDAs, they have the standard 1911 style SA skeleton trigger, I'm not sure if that trigger can be used in a double action pistol. Therefore My vote is that these are Para p-18s, especially since it's the same trigger used on the P-18s -Deadlysyn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BDS2-9.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Romeo ([[Clifton Collins, Jr.]]) racks the slide of his custom 45 - note that the words &amp;quot;El Jefe&amp;quot; are engraved in the slide - .45 acp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah they have SA triggers. Maybe they were converted to SA? Is that possible? --[[User:Predator20|Predator20]] 19:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe the armorer meant Agent Bloom's weapon was the LDA. Just watched special features and that's what I heard him say. - JanG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.para-usa.com/new/images/product_large/PCX745Sphoto_big.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
Closest Para I could find, based on serration angle and spacing, and the sights. Only problem, the LTC is a commander length and the ones Romeo uses look like government length. Another possibility is the PXT or the gun rights special edition. Kinda cool to use a gun rights pistol in a movie where fire fights are the appeal. --[[User:Jan|Jan]] 08:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Did the armorer (whichever one is interviewed for the special features) mention if Romeo's guns were P14s or LDAs?  Al Vrkljan, who was ''one'' of the armorers who worked on the movie, specifically told me LDA, but he may have mis-remembered.  I'm guessing that Charles Taylor (the other of the two armorers, and Al's boss) is the guy they interviewed for the special features, and he might have said something else. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Taylor, Romeo's pistols are custom made for the character. They kinda looked like Para PXTs to me, but without the front serrations like the special series. Also, when the armorer showed Agent Bloom's handgun 6.45 can be seen clearly on the side. Here's one that looks like it...&lt;br /&gt;
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y286/5Wire/Firearms/645R.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:26, 24 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN FAL ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just saw the movie myself and am pretty sure those were not FN Fals in the armourer's cage but some type of assault shotgun with a side folding stock. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 13:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::FAL with no magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crew Cut ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hitman adversary is listed as using H&amp;amp;K USPs, but according to the armorer in special features, he uses Sig P226s. Also in the bar shootout where he takes the bartender hostage, you can clearly see that is is a Sig.  -  Jan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did the armorer say whether Crew Cut used the P226R in the church scene, or only the bar shootout, or both?  He definitely uses the P226R in the bar, but I wasn't able to tell what the suppressed pistols were.  I'm getting the Blu Ray of this movie pretty soon (I ordered it from Amazon), so hopefully I'll be able to tell once I get it. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They looked like 226s in the church scene, especially when crew cut laid down next to the priest.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watched special features again and according to the movie armorer (Charles Taylor) crew cut uses 2 sig 226s.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=249356</id>
		<title>Talk:The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=249356"/>
		<updated>2010-03-24T07:25:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* LDA? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;For those who haven't seen it yet, the movie's recently-released trailer (which is the source of our page's info) is here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if2-PYxgL50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it'll follow completely in the vein of its predecessor - totally mindless and full of self-inflated importance, but impossible not to enjoy.  Only thing that bothers me is that Sean Patrick Flannery has really not aged too well - dude's got an obvious double-chin in the trailer.  That, and the fact that I would have preferred to see them using FN Five-Sevens instead of Desert Eagles. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 13:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just watched the trailer. Looks great!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does look awesome. Norman Reedus on the other hand doesn't look like he has aged more than a year or too. I hope it will be better than the first, but it won't be the same with out Willem Dafoe -[[User:Mythekal|Mythekal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm a BIG fan of the original movie (plus I'm a Roman Catholic, have Irish heritage, and was born a fraternal twin, but my twin died during childbirth). We don't only get Sean, Norman, and Billy back, but we get Clifton Collins Jr. as thier dumbass sidekick and Julie Benz as the FBI agent (who looks like an attractive female version of Willem Dafoe). Personally, I think the brothers should use M1911A1 pistols with engraved finishes and white grips that have the Celtic Cross on it. - [[User:Swordfish941|Swordfish941]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=I agree. Having them upgrade from Beretta's to M1911's is like chucking a .25 Saturday Night Special for a Les Baer custom-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 03:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Don't underestimate what a 9mm can do. Especially the beretta 92FS. That gun is a refined killer as is the M1911 series. A man's just as dead with a 9mm slug in his brain as three .45 slugs in his chest. I think they should use .455 WEBLEYS! Those guns are fuckin' BEAUTIFUL! Engrave THEM grips! And desert eagles? please. what are they trying to prove? Don't get me wrong. I got irish heritage too and am AMPED to see this movie...but seriously...desert eagles? But yes. engraved finish M1911A1s would kick an intense amount of ass. Especially if they were mag-na-ported like in Face/off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would rather shoot someone once in the chest with a .45 than the 3-5 rounds of 9x19mm it would take. Webleys would be ridiculous though, as I have never even seen any .455 ammo for sale except for ONCE, and it was $80 for 20 rounds-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 20:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The local Cabelas sells 455 Webley in boxes of twenty cartridges made by Hornady for about $40.00. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 03:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::C'mon man. don't be that way. The .45 would stop a man in his tracks in under three shots though. Everybodys got a gun thats THEIR GUN. Be it a Beretta 92fs or an m1911. The brothers seems pretty effective with them. why should they change? Some men can dot an eye with either gun. proficiency can be much more of a decider in combat than stopping power. A professional with a beretta is much more dangerous than an untrained person with a M1911, and vice versa. I have known those that swear by either gun. It just annoys me that it has become a ritual to scorn the 9X19mm round due to it's supposed lack of lethality. And I doubt you have been shot with either round. If you have I apologize. I suggested Webleys because they are very nice looking guns in my opinion. Note how I said LOOKING. Besides they are using desert eagles with compensators so money seems to be no object to them on their quest for justice, besides they could just reload their empties like everyone else with a webley.&lt;br /&gt;
::Please my friend, sign your posts by pressing the sign button on the edit menu.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 14:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Let me put it this way: I know people who have had to shoot people with 9mm's in self defense. They all told me it took around 3 rounds to make the attacker stop. Also, a Beretta Cougar makes way more sense to me than a 92 due to the fact that the Cougar actually feels like a gun, unlike the Beretta 92 which feels like a toy-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 18:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Who gives a flying fuck if a gun feels like a toy? I actually would like a gun that felt like a toy. That way it wouldn't be heavy. Also, three bullets isn't much. I still prefer .45 ACP, though.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::yeah sorry folks. guess i sorta overreacted 'bout that one. I have found in my experience using a Beretta 92G vertec and a caspian arms M1911 that guns in either caliber can be fine guns. I would be fine using either of the guns I just mentioned in a firefight, or both preferebly. I don't mean like john wooing the guns, I mean like having a spare rod. hell, i'd use a browning HP, or a tokarev, or S&amp;amp;W Model 10, or a 1911, or a H&amp;amp;k U.S.P. .45, or even (god forbid) a glock. A gun's a gun and a kill's a kill. whatever you can kill with, use it. Jeff Cooper swore by his 1911s, just as my father swears by his 586. I knew a man who was mocked for carrying a Star model B when was in the armed forces, but easily shot a man dead in self-defense. .45 = stopping power. 9mm =low recoil. just because a man uses a beretta doesnt mean he likes to spray and pray, maybe he just doesn't like to take the chance he'll be out when he doesnt want to be, just like a man who carries an m1911 isnt necesarily a guy who just wants what's biggest, maybe he just knows what it can do. a man likes what he likes. And I like sammiches and berettas. And webleys. besides they could just use webleys modified to take .45 acp that they can download to usable pressures. Yes folks. I just went back to square one there....still. webley = sexy. well...im sure this argument will go on for eternity....soo continue. And thanks for tellin me about the signature thing. --[[User:ConditionNone|ConditionNone]] 19:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are Webley's in the movie, but they aren't used that much-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 05:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you think a Beretta feels like a toy, you are either enormously obese or you have never shot/held one.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 23:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have held quite few  and I am not obese (I'm a big guy, but not enormous), but I do have massive hands, which explains why I think it feels like a toy and why I prefer heavier weapons. For example, I do not think a Ruger Redhawk w/ a scope is that heavy while everyone else I know who have shot it bitch about how heavy it is-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 01:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey S&amp;amp;Wshooter, didn't mean to come off as an asshole on that last comment. I had a bad day and was kind of angry.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 00:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be fair both the 9mm and 45 ACP are probably the best rounds when using a suppressor. The .45 is naturally a subsonic round while the 147 grain 9mm round lends itself well to use in a suppressed firearm. As for anecdotal evidence on number of rounds there are a good number of stories where a 9mm was as effective as a .45 and there are stories where it took more than one round of .45 to stop an attacker. I happen to like the Beretta 92FS as a firearm and I have never had it jam except after a 1000 round torture test and had a 1911 do the same. Either way with a suppressed Beretta or 1911 the McManus brothers would have had a reliable pistol with which a suppressor would work admirably and would be quite effective. [[Special:Contributions/98.175.58.228|98.175.58.228]] 04:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two things I would like to point out. First of all, Beretta 92s and their variants are known for being heavier guns, since all of them up until 2003 were completely metal, as opposed to the polymer that is now commonly used in many parts of other guns. Even after '03, they were still most metal, and therefore are still quite heavy, compared to most other commercial guns. The second point I wanted to make is mainly directed at the power of the 9x19mm round, versus the power of the .45 ACP round. Sure, the .45 has plenty of stopping power, but the 9mm isn't a weak round. It may take 3-5 rounds to the chest occasionally, but more important then the stopping power of a bullet is where it hits. The .45 has been recorded to take as many as five hits to the chest to kill, while there are multiple incidents of the nine-mil killing in one shot straight through the heart. Sure, stopping power is important, but becomes fairly irrelevant if you're not trying to keep the target alive, and if you actually know how to aim. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 06:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I recently ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
watched the trailer and there's a scene where Billy Connely and a thug face off and the thug is holding a revolver (Ruger Blackhawk maybe?)-[[User:Shooter|Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think they were webley's&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just saw the movie, and those are definitely Webleys. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 08:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the Glock 30 or I guess possibly the 26/27 not on the gun page?  II Duke has one on his left hand shoulder when he has his six guns strapped to him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not to mention the Para Nite Tac (according to movie armorer), S&amp;amp;W 686 &amp;amp; 629.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LDA? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly don't think Romeo is using LDAs as evident by the full triggers.  They still may be Para-Ordnance, and I really like the Italian flag grips though. -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One of the armorers who worked on the movie told me that they were LDAs.  I wouldn't have written it otherwise. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 15:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wasn't he flag on the grips the Mexican flag, not the Italian one?-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 19:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  Not trying to be a prick here, but armorers can be wrong all the time.  Look at Hitman, or in the 1st Boondock Saints movie where the 92FS's transforms to PT92's.  Either way I am by no means an expert, if he's a professional movie armorer than who am I to contradict him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::'''''&amp;quot;but armorers can be wrong all the time&amp;quot;'''''? hahahaha.  Yes, they can be wrong ALL the time, but if they were, they wouldn't get much work now, would they? LOL [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 23:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.  I liked the grips eitherway.  -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as a quick note to anyone looking, these dont look like LDAs, they have the standard 1911 style SA skeleton trigger, I'm not sure if that trigger can be used in a double action pistol. Therefore My vote is that these are Para p-18s, especially since it's the same trigger used on the P-18s -Deadlysyn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BDS2-9.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Romeo ([[Clifton Collins, Jr.]]) racks the slide of his custom 45 - note that the words &amp;quot;El Jefe&amp;quot; are engraved in the slide - .45 acp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah they have SA triggers. Maybe they were converted to SA? Is that possible? --[[User:Predator20|Predator20]] 19:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe the armorer meant Agent Bloom's weapon was the LDA. Just watched special features and that's what I heard him say. - JanG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.para-usa.com/new/images/product_large/PCX745Sphoto_big.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
Closest Para I could find, based on serration angle and spacing, and the sights. Only problem, the LTC is a commander length and the ones Romeo uses look like government length. Another possibility is the PXT or the gun rights special edition. Kinda cool to use a gun rights pistol in a movie where fire fights are the appeal. --[[User:Jan|Jan]] 08:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Did the armorer (whichever one is interviewed for the special features) mention if Romeo's guns were P14s or LDAs?  Al Vrkljan, who was ''one'' of the armorers who worked on the movie, specifically told me LDA, but he may have mis-remembered.  I'm guessing that Charles Taylor (the other of the two armorers, and Al's boss) is the guy they interviewed for the special features, and he might have said something else. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Taylor, Romeo's pistols are custom made for the character. They kinda looked like Para PXTs to me, but without the front serrations like the special series. Also, when the armorer showed Agent Bloom's handgun 6.45 can be seen clearly on the side. Here's one that looks like it...&lt;br /&gt;
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y286/5Wire/Firearms/645R.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN FAL ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just saw the movie myself and am pretty sure those were not FN Fals in the armourer's cage but some type of assault shotgun with a side folding stock. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 13:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::FAL with no magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crew Cut ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hitman adversary is listed as using H&amp;amp;K USPs, but according to the armorer in special features, he uses Sig P226s. Also in the bar shootout where he takes the bartender hostage, you can clearly see that is is a Sig.  -  Jan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did the armorer say whether Crew Cut used the P226R in the church scene, or only the bar shootout, or both?  He definitely uses the P226R in the bar, but I wasn't able to tell what the suppressed pistols were.  I'm getting the Blu Ray of this movie pretty soon (I ordered it from Amazon), so hopefully I'll be able to tell once I get it. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They looked like 226s in the church scene, especially when crew cut laid down next to the priest.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watched special features again and according to the movie armorer (Charles Taylor) crew cut uses 2 sig 226s.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=249355</id>
		<title>Talk:The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=249355"/>
		<updated>2010-03-24T07:15:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* I recently */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;For those who haven't seen it yet, the movie's recently-released trailer (which is the source of our page's info) is here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if2-PYxgL50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it'll follow completely in the vein of its predecessor - totally mindless and full of self-inflated importance, but impossible not to enjoy.  Only thing that bothers me is that Sean Patrick Flannery has really not aged too well - dude's got an obvious double-chin in the trailer.  That, and the fact that I would have preferred to see them using FN Five-Sevens instead of Desert Eagles. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 13:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just watched the trailer. Looks great!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does look awesome. Norman Reedus on the other hand doesn't look like he has aged more than a year or too. I hope it will be better than the first, but it won't be the same with out Willem Dafoe -[[User:Mythekal|Mythekal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm a BIG fan of the original movie (plus I'm a Roman Catholic, have Irish heritage, and was born a fraternal twin, but my twin died during childbirth). We don't only get Sean, Norman, and Billy back, but we get Clifton Collins Jr. as thier dumbass sidekick and Julie Benz as the FBI agent (who looks like an attractive female version of Willem Dafoe). Personally, I think the brothers should use M1911A1 pistols with engraved finishes and white grips that have the Celtic Cross on it. - [[User:Swordfish941|Swordfish941]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=I agree. Having them upgrade from Beretta's to M1911's is like chucking a .25 Saturday Night Special for a Les Baer custom-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 03:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Don't underestimate what a 9mm can do. Especially the beretta 92FS. That gun is a refined killer as is the M1911 series. A man's just as dead with a 9mm slug in his brain as three .45 slugs in his chest. I think they should use .455 WEBLEYS! Those guns are fuckin' BEAUTIFUL! Engrave THEM grips! And desert eagles? please. what are they trying to prove? Don't get me wrong. I got irish heritage too and am AMPED to see this movie...but seriously...desert eagles? But yes. engraved finish M1911A1s would kick an intense amount of ass. Especially if they were mag-na-ported like in Face/off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would rather shoot someone once in the chest with a .45 than the 3-5 rounds of 9x19mm it would take. Webleys would be ridiculous though, as I have never even seen any .455 ammo for sale except for ONCE, and it was $80 for 20 rounds-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 20:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The local Cabelas sells 455 Webley in boxes of twenty cartridges made by Hornady for about $40.00. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 03:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::C'mon man. don't be that way. The .45 would stop a man in his tracks in under three shots though. Everybodys got a gun thats THEIR GUN. Be it a Beretta 92fs or an m1911. The brothers seems pretty effective with them. why should they change? Some men can dot an eye with either gun. proficiency can be much more of a decider in combat than stopping power. A professional with a beretta is much more dangerous than an untrained person with a M1911, and vice versa. I have known those that swear by either gun. It just annoys me that it has become a ritual to scorn the 9X19mm round due to it's supposed lack of lethality. And I doubt you have been shot with either round. If you have I apologize. I suggested Webleys because they are very nice looking guns in my opinion. Note how I said LOOKING. Besides they are using desert eagles with compensators so money seems to be no object to them on their quest for justice, besides they could just reload their empties like everyone else with a webley.&lt;br /&gt;
::Please my friend, sign your posts by pressing the sign button on the edit menu.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 14:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Let me put it this way: I know people who have had to shoot people with 9mm's in self defense. They all told me it took around 3 rounds to make the attacker stop. Also, a Beretta Cougar makes way more sense to me than a 92 due to the fact that the Cougar actually feels like a gun, unlike the Beretta 92 which feels like a toy-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 18:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Who gives a flying fuck if a gun feels like a toy? I actually would like a gun that felt like a toy. That way it wouldn't be heavy. Also, three bullets isn't much. I still prefer .45 ACP, though.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::yeah sorry folks. guess i sorta overreacted 'bout that one. I have found in my experience using a Beretta 92G vertec and a caspian arms M1911 that guns in either caliber can be fine guns. I would be fine using either of the guns I just mentioned in a firefight, or both preferebly. I don't mean like john wooing the guns, I mean like having a spare rod. hell, i'd use a browning HP, or a tokarev, or S&amp;amp;W Model 10, or a 1911, or a H&amp;amp;k U.S.P. .45, or even (god forbid) a glock. A gun's a gun and a kill's a kill. whatever you can kill with, use it. Jeff Cooper swore by his 1911s, just as my father swears by his 586. I knew a man who was mocked for carrying a Star model B when was in the armed forces, but easily shot a man dead in self-defense. .45 = stopping power. 9mm =low recoil. just because a man uses a beretta doesnt mean he likes to spray and pray, maybe he just doesn't like to take the chance he'll be out when he doesnt want to be, just like a man who carries an m1911 isnt necesarily a guy who just wants what's biggest, maybe he just knows what it can do. a man likes what he likes. And I like sammiches and berettas. And webleys. besides they could just use webleys modified to take .45 acp that they can download to usable pressures. Yes folks. I just went back to square one there....still. webley = sexy. well...im sure this argument will go on for eternity....soo continue. And thanks for tellin me about the signature thing. --[[User:ConditionNone|ConditionNone]] 19:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are Webley's in the movie, but they aren't used that much-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 05:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you think a Beretta feels like a toy, you are either enormously obese or you have never shot/held one.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 23:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have held quite few  and I am not obese (I'm a big guy, but not enormous), but I do have massive hands, which explains why I think it feels like a toy and why I prefer heavier weapons. For example, I do not think a Ruger Redhawk w/ a scope is that heavy while everyone else I know who have shot it bitch about how heavy it is-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 01:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey S&amp;amp;Wshooter, didn't mean to come off as an asshole on that last comment. I had a bad day and was kind of angry.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 00:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be fair both the 9mm and 45 ACP are probably the best rounds when using a suppressor. The .45 is naturally a subsonic round while the 147 grain 9mm round lends itself well to use in a suppressed firearm. As for anecdotal evidence on number of rounds there are a good number of stories where a 9mm was as effective as a .45 and there are stories where it took more than one round of .45 to stop an attacker. I happen to like the Beretta 92FS as a firearm and I have never had it jam except after a 1000 round torture test and had a 1911 do the same. Either way with a suppressed Beretta or 1911 the McManus brothers would have had a reliable pistol with which a suppressor would work admirably and would be quite effective. [[Special:Contributions/98.175.58.228|98.175.58.228]] 04:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two things I would like to point out. First of all, Beretta 92s and their variants are known for being heavier guns, since all of them up until 2003 were completely metal, as opposed to the polymer that is now commonly used in many parts of other guns. Even after '03, they were still most metal, and therefore are still quite heavy, compared to most other commercial guns. The second point I wanted to make is mainly directed at the power of the 9x19mm round, versus the power of the .45 ACP round. Sure, the .45 has plenty of stopping power, but the 9mm isn't a weak round. It may take 3-5 rounds to the chest occasionally, but more important then the stopping power of a bullet is where it hits. The .45 has been recorded to take as many as five hits to the chest to kill, while there are multiple incidents of the nine-mil killing in one shot straight through the heart. Sure, stopping power is important, but becomes fairly irrelevant if you're not trying to keep the target alive, and if you actually know how to aim. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 06:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I recently ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
watched the trailer and there's a scene where Billy Connely and a thug face off and the thug is holding a revolver (Ruger Blackhawk maybe?)-[[User:Shooter|Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think they were webley's&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just saw the movie, and those are definitely Webleys. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 08:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the Glock 30 or I guess possibly the 26/27 not on the gun page?  II Duke has one on his left hand shoulder when he has his six guns strapped to him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not to mention the Para Nite Tac (according to movie armorer), S&amp;amp;W 686 &amp;amp; 629.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LDA? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly don't think Romeo is using LDAs as evident by the full triggers.  They still may be Para-Ordnance, and I really like the Italian flag grips though. -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One of the armorers who worked on the movie told me that they were LDAs.  I wouldn't have written it otherwise. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 15:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wasn't he flag on the grips the Mexican flag, not the Italian one?-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 19:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  Not trying to be a prick here, but armorers can be wrong all the time.  Look at Hitman, or in the 1st Boondock Saints movie where the 92FS's transforms to PT92's.  Either way I am by no means an expert, if he's a professional movie armorer than who am I to contradict him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::'''''&amp;quot;but armorers can be wrong all the time&amp;quot;'''''? hahahaha.  Yes, they can be wrong ALL the time, but if they were, they wouldn't get much work now, would they? LOL [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 23:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.  I liked the grips eitherway.  -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as a quick note to anyone looking, these dont look like LDAs, they have the standard 1911 style SA skeleton trigger, I'm not sure if that trigger can be used in a double action pistol. Therefore My vote is that these are Para p-18s, especially since it's the same trigger used on the P-18s -Deadlysyn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BDS2-9.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Romeo ([[Clifton Collins, Jr.]]) racks the slide of his custom 45 - note that the words &amp;quot;El Jefe&amp;quot; are engraved in the slide - .45 acp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah they have SA triggers. Maybe they were converted to SA? Is that possible? --[[User:Predator20|Predator20]] 19:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe the armorer meant Agent Bloom's weapon was the LDA. Just watched special features and that's what I heard him say. - JanG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.para-usa.com/new/images/product_large/PCX745Sphoto_big.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
Closest Para I could find, based on serration angle and spacing, and the sights. Only problem, the LTC is a commander length and the ones Romeo uses look like government length. Another possibility is the PXT or the gun rights special edition. Kinda cool to use a gun rights pistol in a movie where fire fights are the appeal. --[[User:Jan|Jan]] 08:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Did the armorer (whichever one is interviewed for the special features) mention if Romeo's guns were P14s or LDAs?  Al Vrkljan, who was ''one'' of the armorers who worked on the movie, specifically told me LDA, but he may have mis-remembered.  I'm guessing that Charles Taylor (the other of the two armorers, and Al's boss) is the guy they interviewed for the special features, and he might have said something else. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN FAL ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just saw the movie myself and am pretty sure those were not FN Fals in the armourer's cage but some type of assault shotgun with a side folding stock. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 13:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::FAL with no magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crew Cut ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hitman adversary is listed as using H&amp;amp;K USPs, but according to the armorer in special features, he uses Sig P226s. Also in the bar shootout where he takes the bartender hostage, you can clearly see that is is a Sig.  -  Jan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did the armorer say whether Crew Cut used the P226R in the church scene, or only the bar shootout, or both?  He definitely uses the P226R in the bar, but I wasn't able to tell what the suppressed pistols were.  I'm getting the Blu Ray of this movie pretty soon (I ordered it from Amazon), so hopefully I'll be able to tell once I get it. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They looked like 226s in the church scene, especially when crew cut laid down next to the priest.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watched special features again and according to the movie armorer (Charles Taylor) crew cut uses 2 sig 226s.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=249354</id>
		<title>Talk:The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=249354"/>
		<updated>2010-03-24T07:13:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* Crew Cut */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;For those who haven't seen it yet, the movie's recently-released trailer (which is the source of our page's info) is here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if2-PYxgL50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it'll follow completely in the vein of its predecessor - totally mindless and full of self-inflated importance, but impossible not to enjoy.  Only thing that bothers me is that Sean Patrick Flannery has really not aged too well - dude's got an obvious double-chin in the trailer.  That, and the fact that I would have preferred to see them using FN Five-Sevens instead of Desert Eagles. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 13:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just watched the trailer. Looks great!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does look awesome. Norman Reedus on the other hand doesn't look like he has aged more than a year or too. I hope it will be better than the first, but it won't be the same with out Willem Dafoe -[[User:Mythekal|Mythekal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm a BIG fan of the original movie (plus I'm a Roman Catholic, have Irish heritage, and was born a fraternal twin, but my twin died during childbirth). We don't only get Sean, Norman, and Billy back, but we get Clifton Collins Jr. as thier dumbass sidekick and Julie Benz as the FBI agent (who looks like an attractive female version of Willem Dafoe). Personally, I think the brothers should use M1911A1 pistols with engraved finishes and white grips that have the Celtic Cross on it. - [[User:Swordfish941|Swordfish941]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=I agree. Having them upgrade from Beretta's to M1911's is like chucking a .25 Saturday Night Special for a Les Baer custom-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 03:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Don't underestimate what a 9mm can do. Especially the beretta 92FS. That gun is a refined killer as is the M1911 series. A man's just as dead with a 9mm slug in his brain as three .45 slugs in his chest. I think they should use .455 WEBLEYS! Those guns are fuckin' BEAUTIFUL! Engrave THEM grips! And desert eagles? please. what are they trying to prove? Don't get me wrong. I got irish heritage too and am AMPED to see this movie...but seriously...desert eagles? But yes. engraved finish M1911A1s would kick an intense amount of ass. Especially if they were mag-na-ported like in Face/off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would rather shoot someone once in the chest with a .45 than the 3-5 rounds of 9x19mm it would take. Webleys would be ridiculous though, as I have never even seen any .455 ammo for sale except for ONCE, and it was $80 for 20 rounds-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 20:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The local Cabelas sells 455 Webley in boxes of twenty cartridges made by Hornady for about $40.00. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 03:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::C'mon man. don't be that way. The .45 would stop a man in his tracks in under three shots though. Everybodys got a gun thats THEIR GUN. Be it a Beretta 92fs or an m1911. The brothers seems pretty effective with them. why should they change? Some men can dot an eye with either gun. proficiency can be much more of a decider in combat than stopping power. A professional with a beretta is much more dangerous than an untrained person with a M1911, and vice versa. I have known those that swear by either gun. It just annoys me that it has become a ritual to scorn the 9X19mm round due to it's supposed lack of lethality. And I doubt you have been shot with either round. If you have I apologize. I suggested Webleys because they are very nice looking guns in my opinion. Note how I said LOOKING. Besides they are using desert eagles with compensators so money seems to be no object to them on their quest for justice, besides they could just reload their empties like everyone else with a webley.&lt;br /&gt;
::Please my friend, sign your posts by pressing the sign button on the edit menu.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 14:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Let me put it this way: I know people who have had to shoot people with 9mm's in self defense. They all told me it took around 3 rounds to make the attacker stop. Also, a Beretta Cougar makes way more sense to me than a 92 due to the fact that the Cougar actually feels like a gun, unlike the Beretta 92 which feels like a toy-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 18:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Who gives a flying fuck if a gun feels like a toy? I actually would like a gun that felt like a toy. That way it wouldn't be heavy. Also, three bullets isn't much. I still prefer .45 ACP, though.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::yeah sorry folks. guess i sorta overreacted 'bout that one. I have found in my experience using a Beretta 92G vertec and a caspian arms M1911 that guns in either caliber can be fine guns. I would be fine using either of the guns I just mentioned in a firefight, or both preferebly. I don't mean like john wooing the guns, I mean like having a spare rod. hell, i'd use a browning HP, or a tokarev, or S&amp;amp;W Model 10, or a 1911, or a H&amp;amp;k U.S.P. .45, or even (god forbid) a glock. A gun's a gun and a kill's a kill. whatever you can kill with, use it. Jeff Cooper swore by his 1911s, just as my father swears by his 586. I knew a man who was mocked for carrying a Star model B when was in the armed forces, but easily shot a man dead in self-defense. .45 = stopping power. 9mm =low recoil. just because a man uses a beretta doesnt mean he likes to spray and pray, maybe he just doesn't like to take the chance he'll be out when he doesnt want to be, just like a man who carries an m1911 isnt necesarily a guy who just wants what's biggest, maybe he just knows what it can do. a man likes what he likes. And I like sammiches and berettas. And webleys. besides they could just use webleys modified to take .45 acp that they can download to usable pressures. Yes folks. I just went back to square one there....still. webley = sexy. well...im sure this argument will go on for eternity....soo continue. And thanks for tellin me about the signature thing. --[[User:ConditionNone|ConditionNone]] 19:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are Webley's in the movie, but they aren't used that much-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 05:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you think a Beretta feels like a toy, you are either enormously obese or you have never shot/held one.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 23:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have held quite few  and I am not obese (I'm a big guy, but not enormous), but I do have massive hands, which explains why I think it feels like a toy and why I prefer heavier weapons. For example, I do not think a Ruger Redhawk w/ a scope is that heavy while everyone else I know who have shot it bitch about how heavy it is-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 01:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey S&amp;amp;Wshooter, didn't mean to come off as an asshole on that last comment. I had a bad day and was kind of angry.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 00:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be fair both the 9mm and 45 ACP are probably the best rounds when using a suppressor. The .45 is naturally a subsonic round while the 147 grain 9mm round lends itself well to use in a suppressed firearm. As for anecdotal evidence on number of rounds there are a good number of stories where a 9mm was as effective as a .45 and there are stories where it took more than one round of .45 to stop an attacker. I happen to like the Beretta 92FS as a firearm and I have never had it jam except after a 1000 round torture test and had a 1911 do the same. Either way with a suppressed Beretta or 1911 the McManus brothers would have had a reliable pistol with which a suppressor would work admirably and would be quite effective. [[Special:Contributions/98.175.58.228|98.175.58.228]] 04:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two things I would like to point out. First of all, Beretta 92s and their variants are known for being heavier guns, since all of them up until 2003 were completely metal, as opposed to the polymer that is now commonly used in many parts of other guns. Even after '03, they were still most metal, and therefore are still quite heavy, compared to most other commercial guns. The second point I wanted to make is mainly directed at the power of the 9x19mm round, versus the power of the .45 ACP round. Sure, the .45 has plenty of stopping power, but the 9mm isn't a weak round. It may take 3-5 rounds to the chest occasionally, but more important then the stopping power of a bullet is where it hits. The .45 has been recorded to take as many as five hits to the chest to kill, while there are multiple incidents of the nine-mil killing in one shot straight through the heart. Sure, stopping power is important, but becomes fairly irrelevant if you're not trying to keep the target alive, and if you actually know how to aim. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 06:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I recently ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
watched the trailer and there's a scene where Billy Connely and a thug face off and the thug is holding a revolver (Ruger Blackhawk maybe?)-[[User:Shooter|Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think they were webley's&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just saw the movie, and those are definitely Webleys. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 08:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the Glock 30 or I guess possibly the 26/27 not on the gun page?  II Duke has one on his left hand shoulder when he has his six guns strapped to him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LDA? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly don't think Romeo is using LDAs as evident by the full triggers.  They still may be Para-Ordnance, and I really like the Italian flag grips though. -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One of the armorers who worked on the movie told me that they were LDAs.  I wouldn't have written it otherwise. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 15:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wasn't he flag on the grips the Mexican flag, not the Italian one?-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 19:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  Not trying to be a prick here, but armorers can be wrong all the time.  Look at Hitman, or in the 1st Boondock Saints movie where the 92FS's transforms to PT92's.  Either way I am by no means an expert, if he's a professional movie armorer than who am I to contradict him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::'''''&amp;quot;but armorers can be wrong all the time&amp;quot;'''''? hahahaha.  Yes, they can be wrong ALL the time, but if they were, they wouldn't get much work now, would they? LOL [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 23:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.  I liked the grips eitherway.  -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as a quick note to anyone looking, these dont look like LDAs, they have the standard 1911 style SA skeleton trigger, I'm not sure if that trigger can be used in a double action pistol. Therefore My vote is that these are Para p-18s, especially since it's the same trigger used on the P-18s -Deadlysyn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BDS2-9.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Romeo ([[Clifton Collins, Jr.]]) racks the slide of his custom 45 - note that the words &amp;quot;El Jefe&amp;quot; are engraved in the slide - .45 acp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah they have SA triggers. Maybe they were converted to SA? Is that possible? --[[User:Predator20|Predator20]] 19:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe the armorer meant Agent Bloom's weapon was the LDA. Just watched special features and that's what I heard him say. - JanG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.para-usa.com/new/images/product_large/PCX745Sphoto_big.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
Closest Para I could find, based on serration angle and spacing, and the sights. Only problem, the LTC is a commander length and the ones Romeo uses look like government length. Another possibility is the PXT or the gun rights special edition. Kinda cool to use a gun rights pistol in a movie where fire fights are the appeal. --[[User:Jan|Jan]] 08:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Did the armorer (whichever one is interviewed for the special features) mention if Romeo's guns were P14s or LDAs?  Al Vrkljan, who was ''one'' of the armorers who worked on the movie, specifically told me LDA, but he may have mis-remembered.  I'm guessing that Charles Taylor (the other of the two armorers, and Al's boss) is the guy they interviewed for the special features, and he might have said something else. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN FAL ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just saw the movie myself and am pretty sure those were not FN Fals in the armourer's cage but some type of assault shotgun with a side folding stock. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 13:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::FAL with no magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crew Cut ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hitman adversary is listed as using H&amp;amp;K USPs, but according to the armorer in special features, he uses Sig P226s. Also in the bar shootout where he takes the bartender hostage, you can clearly see that is is a Sig.  -  Jan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did the armorer say whether Crew Cut used the P226R in the church scene, or only the bar shootout, or both?  He definitely uses the P226R in the bar, but I wasn't able to tell what the suppressed pistols were.  I'm getting the Blu Ray of this movie pretty soon (I ordered it from Amazon), so hopefully I'll be able to tell once I get it. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They looked like 226s in the church scene, especially when crew cut laid down next to the priest.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watched special features again and according to the movie armorer (Charles Taylor) crew cut uses 2 sig 226s.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Call_of_Duty_4:_Modern_Warfare&amp;diff=245229</id>
		<title>Talk:Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Call_of_Duty_4:_Modern_Warfare&amp;diff=245229"/>
		<updated>2010-03-15T22:36:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* The 1911 in-game */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Ah, goddamnit. I wanted to do this.&lt;br /&gt;
Well, maybe i can make it up to IMFDB standards sometime, just '''DON'T''' do Half-Life 2. - [[User:Flying Dane|Flying Dane]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==MP5==&lt;br /&gt;
This is not an MP5A3/SD as previously suggested, as it has a flat sided receiver with pictogram markings instead of the S-E-F markings on the A3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wrong, It's an MP5N/SDN, it doesn't have the 4th selector option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please, keep the commentary on the discussion page. At any rate, I added a capture with a clearer view of the selector and its lack of a fourth position. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:42, 15 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Screenshots==&lt;br /&gt;
I have a lot of shots for the page and will upload them tommorow. -GM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've got a crapload of good real pictures for a lot of the guns, but I don't have any clue as to how to upload them, so, for anyone that can, email me at r1c0ch37@gmail.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== You know what would have been better? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I kinda wished the creators of this game made more guns for us to use. There are so many modern firearms at least they could put in the multiplayer. Like the G36 carrying handle instead of the rail, H&amp;amp;K machineguns, H&amp;amp;K grenade launchers, a full auto M16 in the multiplayer, the option to put every accessory on your primary, like sights, suppressor, and grenade launcher all in one instead of just pick only one. I know they did that for balance, but screw balance. Let's see, what else? The UMP, Mac-10, Glocks (specificly the Glock 18), Drum magazines, AUG, Tavor, SA80/L85A1, L96A1, MP7A1. I know I'm starting to sound like I'm turning the gun choices of COD4 into Rainbow Six, but that's why I like that game a lot because it has SO MANY GUNS to pick from and the option of putting whatever you want. I want the ability to change firing modes, to add and take off suppressors. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 20:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Not to mention having the actual front sight posts still present on optic-equipped M16s and M4s would have been nice. I realize they probably removed it to give better visibility, but still. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Spartan198&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Firing selectors would have been nice. Full auto or nothing is kind of lame. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::According to gamers, the military doesn't use semi-automatic (sarcasm). [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 09:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Spartan198&lt;br /&gt;
:Yet it's all modeled on semi. Or safe.-protoAuthor 01:45, 25 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well screw hardcore gamers. I have most of the Tom Clancy games and those you can select weapons to semi and auto and even some have bursts mode[[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 01:06,&lt;br /&gt;
 3 April 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree completely with you. In most situations in-game, I seemingly always find myself tapping the trigger for single shots instead of firing bursts. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 07:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC) Spartan198&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i would have liked to have seen the L96A1 and or the AW50F, as these would have been awesome in cod, also the glock 18, SR-25, and i would have liked to do my own customising of weapons, like on the M16 on the modified version you lose the front sights which just look wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is ok to put pics on this from other websites. [[User:Drjuki]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I want a goddamm regular FN FAL and a IMI Galil AR with the wood hand guards. They would be perfect in the hands of terrorists in the game. They already have the G3 why not a FN FAL?[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i would have liked to customised the weapons myself&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my opinion the worst choice of the Infinity Ward was the selection of the MP-44 as &amp;quot;final unlock&amp;quot;: is older than the AK-47 and cannot be modified, excepted the selection of the camouiflage painting. Why call the game &amp;quot;Modern Warfare&amp;quot; if the (teorically) ultimate gun is also the oldest???&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Lone Soldier|Lone Soldier]] 03-12-2009&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe the mp44 aka sturm was put in there as an Easter Egg of sorts since this was the first Call of Duty to date that wasnt about WW2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Desert Eagle ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
what finishes do the Desert Eagles have in the game? IMI lists several variants http://www.magnumresearch.com/CustomFinishes.asp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just stainless steel, I think. But don't quote me. I never use it. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 07:07, 20 May 2009 (UTC) Spartan198&lt;br /&gt;
the game has chrome and titanium gold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stainless steel, as well as gold once you reach level 55.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==P90 comments.==&lt;br /&gt;
whoever keeps deleting my edits bugger off, this gun is awesome it is easy to aim and has awesome stopping power, and to say it is weak and inaccurate is just plain rubbish, u would have to be a fool to fail to kill an oppo with this gun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Have at it, but remember - this is the last time I play nice.'' --[[User:Clutch|Clutch]] 19:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
this weapon is the fantastic it is very easy to aim it has good stopping power and at close range it is downright lethal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't we all play nice?!?! [[User:Drjuki]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I stopped playing COD4 because of peoples bickering &amp;quot;Thats a noob gun&amp;quot; &amp;quot;you're camping&amp;quot; &amp;quot;that perk sucks&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a crowd who all believe what perks everyoe should have and what weapons, Id love to see a game by their rules, it would be boring. So waiting a few minuites behid a corner is camping, and i'm kicked for it, but they can sit in a building with a siper level the whole match? Tehn there is the p90 debate. Let people who like it use it, do't start telling them there  a noob and being unfair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come on clutch! Don't be so evil on the kid.[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any weapon or perk combination you use to kill an opposing player is deemed &amp;quot;noobish&amp;quot;. Anymore I just laugh their rants off and go on with the game. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:46, 20 May 2009 (UTC) Spartan198&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's sad people (including myself) stop playing the very good multiplayer because of the other players who just ruin it with loud, abusive talking, silly arguments about trivial matters, and generally making it uncomfortable. [[User:Mcguinness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the noobish comment is spot on as if u use something that the other gamers dont like noobish sod that i kill the lot of em, and the silly arguements comment is also right it gets down right annoying&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== No Browning M2? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Why is there no Browning on the page? It was clearly seen in-game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
umm i dont think glitching outside of the map counts unles your counting the one on the M1 ambrams -scarecrow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Red Dot Sight ==&lt;br /&gt;
The red dot sight on the M4 SOPMOD is a Sure Shot Reflex Sight, not a C-More. [[http://www.afmo.com/Sure_Shot_Reflex_Sight_p/217-00588.htm]] [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 07:14, 20 May 2009 (UTC) Spartan198&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The 1911 Griggs used looks more like a Kimber TLE stainless==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About the Springfield 1911 in the game I also think it is a Springfield opposed to a Kimber Warrior because I have one and the grip is a lighter color plus it has a different magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
umm its a stainless (silver colour) 1911 isnt it? where does it say on the page its a kimber? -scarecrow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Excerpt from Remington 700P==&lt;br /&gt;
*''&amp;quot;Oddly, the M40A3 also seen in game is very much the same weapon, although in the game they have slightly different attributes.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to agree and disagree with this statement, as they can't be classified &amp;quot;as the same weapon&amp;quot;, since the M40A3 has its own model number, designation, and role in the Marine Corps; and was modified from the R700P, one change being the finely rifled heavy barrel. However, both rifles, as mentioned before, are made from the Remington 700 model. I think this should be clarified a bit more clearly. Any thoughts? --''[[User:Blemo|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: gray; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''B'''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A9A9A9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''le'''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#808080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''mo'''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Image:Progress Wheel.gif]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[user talk:Blemo|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A9A9A9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''TALK'''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; • &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;  [[Special:Contributions/Blemo|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A9A9A9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''CONTRIBUTIONS'''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; • &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Special:Emailuser/Blemo|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A9A9A9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''EMAIL'''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; • &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A9A9A9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-weight: light;&amp;quot; title=&amp;quot;By the time you finish reading this hidden message, twelve nuclear warheads will have been launched toward your location. Thank you and have a nice day.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''MESSAGE'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;'' 12:57, 8 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just quick, is the 700p the ltr model or not? Can you tell? [[User:Mcguinness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bluey? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that some M4's and M16's have &amp;quot;Bluey&amp;quot; on the side. Is there a reason for this? Or just something the designers put in?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think it's &amp;quot;Blue 4,&amp;quot; possibly to identify who the rifle belongs to in the squad. [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 11:34, 1 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
yea it says blue 4 on both a M4 and M16 -scarecrow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M4/M16 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I added a little more information about how the gas block removal on an M4/M16 would effect the firearm. It is true that is the gas block is removed that the next round will not chamber automatically. the bolt would have to be racked to load a new round. I just thought I'd add that information to the page. It can be removed if desired. [[User:ShaDow XPS|ShaDow XPS]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M4 Barrel ==&lt;br /&gt;
If anyone's still looking at this page, does it look to you like the M4 has a 16&amp;quot; barrel? It does to me. A perfectly straight 16&amp;quot; barrel (no M203 cuts) and the old style M4 stock. I believe that makes it exactly the same as the C8, which was mentioned as being what the SAS really use, so maybe the M4 in this game is really a C8. If anyone can counter this feel free.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're right about the barrel, I think, but the C8 has a 14.5&amp;quot;, not a 16&amp;quot;. Furthermore, if you look at the rifle without any optics, it has an A2 style rear sight, while the C8's is A1 style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The barrel looks longer because the front sight/gas block is removed when equipped with optics. If you take into account the length of the front sight, the barrel evens out at around 14.5 inches. The &amp;quot;standard&amp;quot; C8 has a 14.5 inch A1 profile barrel, but the C8FTHB (the version used by SAS under the designation L119A1) has a 16.1 inch barrel that bulges out where the M203 step is on an M4 barrel. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 18:27, 23 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L119A1's the SFW, not the FTHB. Although in practice there's probably not much difference. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 20:53, 23 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh right, I forgot about the front sight being removed. Since you never have a carry handle in the SAS missions I wasn't counting that, and I was thinking SFW when I said C8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like the FTHB to me. L119A1 - [http://www.cybershooters.org/dgca/images/M4/C8andAG36.jpg] C8FTHB - [http://www.casr.ca/101-smallarm-1-c8fthb-rifle.jpg] [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 00:51, 25 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference is that the SFW has a stronger front sight to use the HK AG-C/L17A1 grenade launcher.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 09:29, 25 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why would a stronger front sight be needed when the AG-C is RIS-mounted? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 18:44, 25 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just Dropping in to say hi ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Everyone! Just wanted to drop in to say hellogreetings! and also to introduce myself here! The Boards look extremely interesting and i cant wait to become a member of the community!&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;HA HA I'M USING THE INTERENTS!!!1&amp;quot; Seriously?--[[User:PistolJunkie|PistolJunkie]] 03:25, 28 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;HA HA! ESTOY USANDO EL INTERNET!!!1&amp;quot;-protoAuthor 03:37, 28 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::No need to feed the troll, guys. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 06:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The 1911 in-game==&lt;br /&gt;
Not that I disagree that the Springfield Armory Professional 1911 is the 1911 model in-game, but I think that there ''is'' a possibility that it might be a Nighthawk Custom Enforcer Series or GRP 1911. Why? Because the armed forces would likely use higher-ended companies like Nighthawk. Anyway, just a possibility. Any thoughts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LINKS:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.nighthawktactical.com/The_Enforcer.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.nighthawktactical.com/GRP.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Blemo]] 22:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's a negative. The Nighthawk Enforcer is basically a Kimber Warrior without the rail, and the rail wasn't the only thing that made the Kimber Warrior a misidentification. The Novak sights are different, and it has a flat top strap across the slide. As far as the military using &amp;quot;higher end companies&amp;quot; They usually buy what's most cost effective and not necessarily best quality, and since Nighthawk Custom makes.... custom firearms, I doubt they'd have a contract that would be cheap, or at least cheaper than competitors. It's still a Professional. --[[User:Yournamehere|Yournamehere]] 02:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It definitly has those grips though, that was the first thing I noticed. It might not be an Enforcer, but it has the same grips.&lt;br /&gt;
Here (in tan):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
link: http://www.nighthawkcustom.com/detail.aspx?ID=133#&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh and thanks Blemo for bringing this up anyway because I've been trying to put together an airsoft replica of this 1911 for a while, and now I've finally got those damn grips, couldn't find 'em anywhere. I also put together the M4 SOPMOD the S.A.S. use in game as my primary, which makes me Captain Price :D&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: You guys think it could be this one, a Springfield Armory Loaded? Just add the grips I linked above, I'm pretty sure it's exactly the same otherwise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.bullshooterssupply.com/store/images/springfield_armory_1911_a1_px9109lp.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT 2: I used my not so amazing MS Paint skills to put this together for you guys (and me)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CaptainPriceSALoaded.JPG]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:32, 4 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It could be a customized Colt since the front sight does not seem to dovetailed into the slide--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 22:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=243650</id>
		<title>Talk:The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=243650"/>
		<updated>2010-03-11T08:42:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* LDA? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;For those who haven't seen it yet, the movie's recently-released trailer (which is the source of our page's info) is here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if2-PYxgL50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it'll follow completely in the vein of its predecessor - totally mindless and full of self-inflated importance, but impossible not to enjoy.  Only thing that bothers me is that Sean Patrick Flannery has really not aged too well - dude's got an obvious double-chin in the trailer.  That, and the fact that I would have preferred to see them using FN Five-Sevens instead of Desert Eagles. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 13:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just watched the trailer. Looks great!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does look awesome. Norman Reedus on the other hand doesn't look like he has aged more than a year or too. I hope it will be better than the first, but it won't be the same with out Willem Dafoe -[[User:Mythekal|Mythekal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm a BIG fan of the original movie (plus I'm a Roman Catholic, have Irish heritage, and was born a fraternal twin, but my twin died during childbirth). We don't only get Sean, Norman, and Billy back, but we get Clifton Collins Jr. as thier dumbass sidekick and Julie Benz as the FBI agent (who looks like an attractive female version of Willem Dafoe). Personally, I think the brothers should use M1911A1 pistols with engraved finishes and white grips that have the Celtic Cross on it. - [[User:Swordfish941|Swordfish941]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=I agree. Having them upgrade from Beretta's to M1911's is like chucking a .25 Saturday Night Special for a Les Baer custom-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 03:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Don't underestimate what a 9mm can do. Especially the beretta 92FS. That gun is a refined killer as is the M1911 series. A man's just as dead with a 9mm slug in his brain as three .45 slugs in his chest. I think they should use .455 WEBLEYS! Those guns are fuckin' BEAUTIFUL! Engrave THEM grips! And desert eagles? please. what are they trying to prove? Don't get me wrong. I got irish heritage too and am AMPED to see this movie...but seriously...desert eagles? But yes. engraved finish M1911A1s would kick an intense amount of ass. Especially if they were mag-na-ported like in Face/off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would rather shoot someone once in the chest with a .45 than the 3-5 rounds of 9x19mm it would take. Webleys would be ridiculous though, as I have never even seen any .455 ammo for sale except for ONCE, and it was $80 for 20 rounds-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 20:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The local Cabelas sells 455 Webley in boxes of twenty cartridges made by Hornady for about $40.00. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 03:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::C'mon man. don't be that way. The .45 would stop a man in his tracks in under three shots though. Everybodys got a gun thats THEIR GUN. Be it a Beretta 92fs or an m1911. The brothers seems pretty effective with them. why should they change? Some men can dot an eye with either gun. proficiency can be much more of a decider in combat than stopping power. A professional with a beretta is much more dangerous than an untrained person with a M1911, and vice versa. I have known those that swear by either gun. It just annoys me that it has become a ritual to scorn the 9X19mm round due to it's supposed lack of lethality. And I doubt you have been shot with either round. If you have I apologize. I suggested Webleys because they are very nice looking guns in my opinion. Note how I said LOOKING. Besides they are using desert eagles with compensators so money seems to be no object to them on their quest for justice, besides they could just reload their empties like everyone else with a webley.&lt;br /&gt;
::Please my friend, sign your posts by pressing the sign button on the edit menu.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 14:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Let me put it this way: I know people who have had to shoot people with 9mm's in self defense. They all told me it took around 3 rounds to make the attacker stop. Also, a Beretta Cougar makes way more sense to me than a 92 due to the fact that the Cougar actually feels like a gun, unlike the Beretta 92 which feels like a toy-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 18:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Who gives a flying fuck if a gun feels like a toy? I actually would like a gun that felt like a toy. That way it wouldn't be heavy. Also, three bullets isn't much. I still prefer .45 ACP, though.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::yeah sorry folks. guess i sorta overreacted 'bout that one. I have found in my experience using a Beretta 92G vertec and a caspian arms M1911 that guns in either caliber can be fine guns. I would be fine using either of the guns I just mentioned in a firefight, or both preferebly. I don't mean like john wooing the guns, I mean like having a spare rod. hell, i'd use a browning HP, or a tokarev, or S&amp;amp;W Model 10, or a 1911, or a H&amp;amp;k U.S.P. .45, or even (god forbid) a glock. A gun's a gun and a kill's a kill. whatever you can kill with, use it. Jeff Cooper swore by his 1911s, just as my father swears by his 586. I knew a man who was mocked for carrying a Star model B when was in the armed forces, but easily shot a man dead in self-defense. .45 = stopping power. 9mm =low recoil. just because a man uses a beretta doesnt mean he likes to spray and pray, maybe he just doesn't like to take the chance he'll be out when he doesnt want to be, just like a man who carries an m1911 isnt necesarily a guy who just wants what's biggest, maybe he just knows what it can do. a man likes what he likes. And I like sammiches and berettas. And webleys. besides they could just use webleys modified to take .45 acp that they can download to usable pressures. Yes folks. I just went back to square one there....still. webley = sexy. well...im sure this argument will go on for eternity....soo continue. And thanks for tellin me about the signature thing. --[[User:ConditionNone|ConditionNone]] 19:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are Webley's in the movie, but they aren't used that much-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 05:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you think a Beretta feels like a toy, you are either enormously obese or you have never shot/held one.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 23:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have held quite few  and I am not obese (I'm a big guy, but not enormous), but I do have massive hands, which explains why I think it feels like a toy and why I prefer heavier weapons. For example, I do not think a Ruger Redhawk w/ a scope is that heavy while everyone else I know who have shot it bitch about how heavy it is-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 01:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey S&amp;amp;Wshooter, didn't mean to come off as an asshole on that last comment. I had a bad day and was kind of angry.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 00:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be fair both the 9mm and 45 ACP are probably the best rounds when using a suppressor. The .45 is naturally a subsonic round while the 147 grain 9mm round lends itself well to use in a suppressed firearm. As for anecdotal evidence on number of rounds there are a good number of stories where a 9mm was as effective as a .45 and there are stories where it took more than one round of .45 to stop an attacker. I happen to like the Beretta 92FS as a firearm and I have never had it jam except after a 1000 round torture test and had a 1911 do the same. Either way with a suppressed Beretta or 1911 the McManus brothers would have had a reliable pistol with which a suppressor would work admirably and would be quite effective. [[Special:Contributions/98.175.58.228|98.175.58.228]] 04:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two things I would like to point out. First of all, Beretta 92s and their variants are known for being heavier guns, since all of them up until 2003 were completely metal, as opposed to the polymer that is now commonly used in many parts of other guns. Even after '03, they were still most metal, and therefore are still quite heavy, compared to most other commercial guns. The second point I wanted to make is mainly directed at the power of the 9x19mm round, versus the power of the .45 ACP round. Sure, the .45 has plenty of stopping power, but the 9mm isn't a weak round. It may take 3-5 rounds to the chest occasionally, but more important then the stopping power of a bullet is where it hits. The .45 has been recorded to take as many as five hits to the chest to kill, while there are multiple incidents of the nine-mil killing in one shot straight through the heart. Sure, stopping power is important, but becomes fairly irrelevant if you're not trying to keep the target alive, and if you actually know how to aim. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 06:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I recently ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
watched the trailer and there's a scene where Billy Connely and a thug face off and the thug is holding a revolver (Ruger Blackhawk maybe?)-[[User:Shooter|Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think they were webley's&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just saw the movie, and those are definitely Webleys. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 08:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the Glock 30 or I guess possibly the 26/27 not on the gun page?  II Duke has one on his left hand shoulder when he has his six guns strapped to him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LDA? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly don't think Romeo is using LDAs as evident by the full triggers.  They still may be Para-Ordnance, and I really like the Italian flag grips though. -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One of the armorers who worked on the movie told me that they were LDAs.  I wouldn't have written it otherwise. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 15:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wasn't he flag on the grips the Mexican flag, not the Italian one?-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 19:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  Not trying to be a prick here, but armorers can be wrong all the time.  Look at Hitman, or in the 1st Boondock Saints movie where the 92FS's transforms to PT92's.  Either way I am by no means an expert, if he's a professional movie armorer than who am I to contradict him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::'''''&amp;quot;but armorers can be wrong all the time&amp;quot;'''''? hahahaha.  Yes, they can be wrong ALL the time, but if they were, they wouldn't get much work now, would they? LOL [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 23:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.  I liked the grips eitherway.  -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as a quick note to anyone looking, these dont look like LDAs, they have the standard 1911 style SA skeleton trigger, I'm not sure if that trigger can be used in a double action pistol. Therefore My vote is that these are Para p-18s, especially since it's the same trigger used on the P-18s -Deadlysyn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BDS2-9.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Romeo ([[Clifton Collins, Jr.]]) racks the slide of his custom 45 - note that the words &amp;quot;El Jefe&amp;quot; are engraved in the slide - .45 acp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah they have SA triggers. Maybe they were converted to SA? Is that possible? --[[User:Predator20|Predator20]] 19:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe the armorer meant Agent Bloom's weapon was the LDA. Just watched special features and that's what I heard him say. - JanG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.para-usa.com/new/images/product_large/PCX745Sphoto_big.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
Closest Para I could find, based on serration angle and spacing, and the sights. Only problem, the LTC is a commander length and the ones Romeo uses look like government length. Another possibility is the PXT or the gun rights special edition. Kinda cool to use a gun rights pistol in a movie where fire fights are the appeal. --[[User:Jan|Jan]] 08:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN FAL ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just saw the movie myself and am pretty sure those were not FN Fals in the armourer's cage but some type of assault shotgun with a side folding stock. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 13:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::FAL with no magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crew Cut ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hitman adversary is listed as using H&amp;amp;K USPs, but according to the armorer in special features, he uses Sig P226s. Also in the bar shootout where he takes the bartender hostage, you can clearly see that is is a Sig.  -  Jan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did the armorer say whether Crew Cut used the P226R in the church scene, or only the bar shootout, or both?  He definitely uses the P226R in the bar, but I wasn't able to tell what the suppressed pistols were.  I'm getting the Blu Ray of this movie pretty soon (I ordered it from Amazon), so hopefully I'll be able to tell once I get it. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They looked like 226s in the church scene, especially when crew cut laid down next to the priest.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=243591</id>
		<title>Talk:The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=243591"/>
		<updated>2010-03-11T07:22:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* Crew Cut */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;For those who haven't seen it yet, the movie's recently-released trailer (which is the source of our page's info) is here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if2-PYxgL50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it'll follow completely in the vein of its predecessor - totally mindless and full of self-inflated importance, but impossible not to enjoy.  Only thing that bothers me is that Sean Patrick Flannery has really not aged too well - dude's got an obvious double-chin in the trailer.  That, and the fact that I would have preferred to see them using FN Five-Sevens instead of Desert Eagles. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 13:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just watched the trailer. Looks great!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does look awesome. Norman Reedus on the other hand doesn't look like he has aged more than a year or too. I hope it will be better than the first, but it won't be the same with out Willem Dafoe -[[User:Mythekal|Mythekal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm a BIG fan of the original movie (plus I'm a Roman Catholic, have Irish heritage, and was born a fraternal twin, but my twin died during childbirth). We don't only get Sean, Norman, and Billy back, but we get Clifton Collins Jr. as thier dumbass sidekick and Julie Benz as the FBI agent (who looks like an attractive female version of Willem Dafoe). Personally, I think the brothers should use M1911A1 pistols with engraved finishes and white grips that have the Celtic Cross on it. - [[User:Swordfish941|Swordfish941]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=I agree. Having them upgrade from Beretta's to M1911's is like chucking a .25 Saturday Night Special for a Les Baer custom-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 03:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Don't underestimate what a 9mm can do. Especially the beretta 92FS. That gun is a refined killer as is the M1911 series. A man's just as dead with a 9mm slug in his brain as three .45 slugs in his chest. I think they should use .455 WEBLEYS! Those guns are fuckin' BEAUTIFUL! Engrave THEM grips! And desert eagles? please. what are they trying to prove? Don't get me wrong. I got irish heritage too and am AMPED to see this movie...but seriously...desert eagles? But yes. engraved finish M1911A1s would kick an intense amount of ass. Especially if they were mag-na-ported like in Face/off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would rather shoot someone once in the chest with a .45 than the 3-5 rounds of 9x19mm it would take. Webleys would be ridiculous though, as I have never even seen any .455 ammo for sale except for ONCE, and it was $80 for 20 rounds-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 20:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The local Cabelas sells 455 Webley in boxes of twenty cartridges made by Hornady for about $40.00. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 03:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::C'mon man. don't be that way. The .45 would stop a man in his tracks in under three shots though. Everybodys got a gun thats THEIR GUN. Be it a Beretta 92fs or an m1911. The brothers seems pretty effective with them. why should they change? Some men can dot an eye with either gun. proficiency can be much more of a decider in combat than stopping power. A professional with a beretta is much more dangerous than an untrained person with a M1911, and vice versa. I have known those that swear by either gun. It just annoys me that it has become a ritual to scorn the 9X19mm round due to it's supposed lack of lethality. And I doubt you have been shot with either round. If you have I apologize. I suggested Webleys because they are very nice looking guns in my opinion. Note how I said LOOKING. Besides they are using desert eagles with compensators so money seems to be no object to them on their quest for justice, besides they could just reload their empties like everyone else with a webley.&lt;br /&gt;
::Please my friend, sign your posts by pressing the sign button on the edit menu.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 14:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Let me put it this way: I know people who have had to shoot people with 9mm's in self defense. They all told me it took around 3 rounds to make the attacker stop. Also, a Beretta Cougar makes way more sense to me than a 92 due to the fact that the Cougar actually feels like a gun, unlike the Beretta 92 which feels like a toy-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 18:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Who gives a flying fuck if a gun feels like a toy? I actually would like a gun that felt like a toy. That way it wouldn't be heavy. Also, three bullets isn't much. I still prefer .45 ACP, though.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::yeah sorry folks. guess i sorta overreacted 'bout that one. I have found in my experience using a Beretta 92G vertec and a caspian arms M1911 that guns in either caliber can be fine guns. I would be fine using either of the guns I just mentioned in a firefight, or both preferebly. I don't mean like john wooing the guns, I mean like having a spare rod. hell, i'd use a browning HP, or a tokarev, or S&amp;amp;W Model 10, or a 1911, or a H&amp;amp;k U.S.P. .45, or even (god forbid) a glock. A gun's a gun and a kill's a kill. whatever you can kill with, use it. Jeff Cooper swore by his 1911s, just as my father swears by his 586. I knew a man who was mocked for carrying a Star model B when was in the armed forces, but easily shot a man dead in self-defense. .45 = stopping power. 9mm =low recoil. just because a man uses a beretta doesnt mean he likes to spray and pray, maybe he just doesn't like to take the chance he'll be out when he doesnt want to be, just like a man who carries an m1911 isnt necesarily a guy who just wants what's biggest, maybe he just knows what it can do. a man likes what he likes. And I like sammiches and berettas. And webleys. besides they could just use webleys modified to take .45 acp that they can download to usable pressures. Yes folks. I just went back to square one there....still. webley = sexy. well...im sure this argument will go on for eternity....soo continue. And thanks for tellin me about the signature thing. --[[User:ConditionNone|ConditionNone]] 19:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are Webley's in the movie, but they aren't used that much-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 05:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you think a Beretta feels like a toy, you are either enormously obese or you have never shot/held one.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 23:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have held quite few  and I am not obese (I'm a big guy, but not enormous), but I do have massive hands, which explains why I think it feels like a toy and why I prefer heavier weapons. For example, I do not think a Ruger Redhawk w/ a scope is that heavy while everyone else I know who have shot it bitch about how heavy it is-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 01:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey S&amp;amp;Wshooter, didn't mean to come off as an asshole on that last comment. I had a bad day and was kind of angry.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 00:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be fair both the 9mm and 45 ACP are probably the best rounds when using a suppressor. The .45 is naturally a subsonic round while the 147 grain 9mm round lends itself well to use in a suppressed firearm. As for anecdotal evidence on number of rounds there are a good number of stories where a 9mm was as effective as a .45 and there are stories where it took more than one round of .45 to stop an attacker. I happen to like the Beretta 92FS as a firearm and I have never had it jam except after a 1000 round torture test and had a 1911 do the same. Either way with a suppressed Beretta or 1911 the McManus brothers would have had a reliable pistol with which a suppressor would work admirably and would be quite effective. [[Special:Contributions/98.175.58.228|98.175.58.228]] 04:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two things I would like to point out. First of all, Beretta 92s and their variants are known for being heavier guns, since all of them up until 2003 were completely metal, as opposed to the polymer that is now commonly used in many parts of other guns. Even after '03, they were still most metal, and therefore are still quite heavy, compared to most other commercial guns. The second point I wanted to make is mainly directed at the power of the 9x19mm round, versus the power of the .45 ACP round. Sure, the .45 has plenty of stopping power, but the 9mm isn't a weak round. It may take 3-5 rounds to the chest occasionally, but more important then the stopping power of a bullet is where it hits. The .45 has been recorded to take as many as five hits to the chest to kill, while there are multiple incidents of the nine-mil killing in one shot straight through the heart. Sure, stopping power is important, but becomes fairly irrelevant if you're not trying to keep the target alive, and if you actually know how to aim. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 06:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I recently ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
watched the trailer and there's a scene where Billy Connely and a thug face off and the thug is holding a revolver (Ruger Blackhawk maybe?)-[[User:Shooter|Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think they were webley's&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just saw the movie, and those are definitely Webleys. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 08:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the Glock 30 or I guess possibly the 26/27 not on the gun page?  II Duke has one on his left hand shoulder when he has his six guns strapped to him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LDA? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly don't think Romeo is using LDAs as evident by the full triggers.  They still may be Para-Ordnance, and I really like the Italian flag grips though. -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One of the armorers who worked on the movie told me that they were LDAs.  I wouldn't have written it otherwise. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 15:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wasn't he flag on the grips the Mexican flag, not the Italian one?-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 19:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  Not trying to be a prick here, but armorers can be wrong all the time.  Look at Hitman, or in the 1st Boondock Saints movie where the 92FS's transforms to PT92's.  Either way I am by no means an expert, if he's a professional movie armorer than who am I to contradict him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::'''''&amp;quot;but armorers can be wrong all the time&amp;quot;'''''? hahahaha.  Yes, they can be wrong ALL the time, but if they were, they wouldn't get much work now, would they? LOL [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 23:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.  I liked the grips eitherway.  -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as a quick note to anyone looking, these dont look like LDAs, they have the standard 1911 style SA skeleton trigger, I'm not sure if that trigger can be used in a double action pistol. Therefore My vote is that these are Para p-18s, especially since it's the same trigger used on the P-18s -Deadlysyn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BDS2-9.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Romeo ([[Clifton Collins, Jr.]]) racks the slide of his custom 45 - note that the words &amp;quot;El Jefe&amp;quot; are engraved in the slide - .45 acp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah they have SA triggers. Maybe they were converted to SA? Is that possible? --[[User:Predator20|Predator20]] 19:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe the armorer meant Agent Bloom's weapon was the LDA. Just watched special features and that's what I heard him say. - JanG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN FAL ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just saw the movie myself and am pretty sure those were not FN Fals in the armourer's cage but some type of assault shotgun with a side folding stock. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 13:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crew Cut ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hitman adversary is listed as using H&amp;amp;K USPs, but according to the armorer in special features, he uses Sig P226s. Also in the bar shootout where he takes the bartender hostage, you can clearly see that is is a Sig.  -  Jan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did the armorer say whether Crew Cut used the P226R in the church scene, or only the bar shootout, or both?  He definitely uses the P226R in the bar, but I wasn't able to tell what the suppressed pistols were.  I'm getting the Blu Ray of this movie pretty soon (I ordered it from Amazon), so hopefully I'll be able to tell once I get it. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They looked like 226s in the church scene, especially when crew cut laid down next to the priest.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] 07:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=243380</id>
		<title>Talk:The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Boondock_Saints_II:_All_Saints_Day&amp;diff=243380"/>
		<updated>2010-03-10T22:10:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* Crew Cut */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;For those who haven't seen it yet, the movie's recently-released trailer (which is the source of our page's info) is here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if2-PYxgL50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it'll follow completely in the vein of its predecessor - totally mindless and full of self-inflated importance, but impossible not to enjoy.  Only thing that bothers me is that Sean Patrick Flannery has really not aged too well - dude's got an obvious double-chin in the trailer.  That, and the fact that I would have preferred to see them using FN Five-Sevens instead of Desert Eagles. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 13:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just watched the trailer. Looks great!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does look awesome. Norman Reedus on the other hand doesn't look like he has aged more than a year or too. I hope it will be better than the first, but it won't be the same with out Willem Dafoe -[[User:Mythekal|Mythekal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm a BIG fan of the original movie (plus I'm a Roman Catholic, have Irish heritage, and was born a fraternal twin, but my twin died during childbirth). We don't only get Sean, Norman, and Billy back, but we get Clifton Collins Jr. as thier dumbass sidekick and Julie Benz as the FBI agent (who looks like an attractive female version of Willem Dafoe). Personally, I think the brothers should use M1911A1 pistols with engraved finishes and white grips that have the Celtic Cross on it. - [[User:Swordfish941|Swordfish941]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=I agree. Having them upgrade from Beretta's to M1911's is like chucking a .25 Saturday Night Special for a Les Baer custom-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 03:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Don't underestimate what a 9mm can do. Especially the beretta 92FS. That gun is a refined killer as is the M1911 series. A man's just as dead with a 9mm slug in his brain as three .45 slugs in his chest. I think they should use .455 WEBLEYS! Those guns are fuckin' BEAUTIFUL! Engrave THEM grips! And desert eagles? please. what are they trying to prove? Don't get me wrong. I got irish heritage too and am AMPED to see this movie...but seriously...desert eagles? But yes. engraved finish M1911A1s would kick an intense amount of ass. Especially if they were mag-na-ported like in Face/off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would rather shoot someone once in the chest with a .45 than the 3-5 rounds of 9x19mm it would take. Webleys would be ridiculous though, as I have never even seen any .455 ammo for sale except for ONCE, and it was $80 for 20 rounds-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 20:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The local Cabelas sells 455 Webley in boxes of twenty cartridges made by Hornady for about $40.00. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 03:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::C'mon man. don't be that way. The .45 would stop a man in his tracks in under three shots though. Everybodys got a gun thats THEIR GUN. Be it a Beretta 92fs or an m1911. The brothers seems pretty effective with them. why should they change? Some men can dot an eye with either gun. proficiency can be much more of a decider in combat than stopping power. A professional with a beretta is much more dangerous than an untrained person with a M1911, and vice versa. I have known those that swear by either gun. It just annoys me that it has become a ritual to scorn the 9X19mm round due to it's supposed lack of lethality. And I doubt you have been shot with either round. If you have I apologize. I suggested Webleys because they are very nice looking guns in my opinion. Note how I said LOOKING. Besides they are using desert eagles with compensators so money seems to be no object to them on their quest for justice, besides they could just reload their empties like everyone else with a webley.&lt;br /&gt;
::Please my friend, sign your posts by pressing the sign button on the edit menu.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 14:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Let me put it this way: I know people who have had to shoot people with 9mm's in self defense. They all told me it took around 3 rounds to make the attacker stop. Also, a Beretta Cougar makes way more sense to me than a 92 due to the fact that the Cougar actually feels like a gun, unlike the Beretta 92 which feels like a toy-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 18:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Who gives a flying fuck if a gun feels like a toy? I actually would like a gun that felt like a toy. That way it wouldn't be heavy. Also, three bullets isn't much. I still prefer .45 ACP, though.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::yeah sorry folks. guess i sorta overreacted 'bout that one. I have found in my experience using a Beretta 92G vertec and a caspian arms M1911 that guns in either caliber can be fine guns. I would be fine using either of the guns I just mentioned in a firefight, or both preferebly. I don't mean like john wooing the guns, I mean like having a spare rod. hell, i'd use a browning HP, or a tokarev, or S&amp;amp;W Model 10, or a 1911, or a H&amp;amp;k U.S.P. .45, or even (god forbid) a glock. A gun's a gun and a kill's a kill. whatever you can kill with, use it. Jeff Cooper swore by his 1911s, just as my father swears by his 586. I knew a man who was mocked for carrying a Star model B when was in the armed forces, but easily shot a man dead in self-defense. .45 = stopping power. 9mm =low recoil. just because a man uses a beretta doesnt mean he likes to spray and pray, maybe he just doesn't like to take the chance he'll be out when he doesnt want to be, just like a man who carries an m1911 isnt necesarily a guy who just wants what's biggest, maybe he just knows what it can do. a man likes what he likes. And I like sammiches and berettas. And webleys. besides they could just use webleys modified to take .45 acp that they can download to usable pressures. Yes folks. I just went back to square one there....still. webley = sexy. well...im sure this argument will go on for eternity....soo continue. And thanks for tellin me about the signature thing. --[[User:ConditionNone|ConditionNone]] 19:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are Webley's in the movie, but they aren't used that much-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 05:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you think a Beretta feels like a toy, you are either enormously obese or you have never shot/held one.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 23:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have held quite few  and I am not obese (I'm a big guy, but not enormous), but I do have massive hands, which explains why I think it feels like a toy and why I prefer heavier weapons. For example, I do not think a Ruger Redhawk w/ a scope is that heavy while everyone else I know who have shot it bitch about how heavy it is-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 01:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey S&amp;amp;Wshooter, didn't mean to come off as an asshole on that last comment. I had a bad day and was kind of angry.--[[User:ColonelTomb|ColonelTomb]] 00:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be fair both the 9mm and 45 ACP are probably the best rounds when using a suppressor. The .45 is naturally a subsonic round while the 147 grain 9mm round lends itself well to use in a suppressed firearm. As for anecdotal evidence on number of rounds there are a good number of stories where a 9mm was as effective as a .45 and there are stories where it took more than one round of .45 to stop an attacker. I happen to like the Beretta 92FS as a firearm and I have never had it jam except after a 1000 round torture test and had a 1911 do the same. Either way with a suppressed Beretta or 1911 the McManus brothers would have had a reliable pistol with which a suppressor would work admirably and would be quite effective. [[Special:Contributions/98.175.58.228|98.175.58.228]] 04:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two things I would like to point out. First of all, Beretta 92s and their variants are known for being heavier guns, since all of them up until 2003 were completely metal, as opposed to the polymer that is now commonly used in many parts of other guns. Even after '03, they were still most metal, and therefore are still quite heavy, compared to most other commercial guns. The second point I wanted to make is mainly directed at the power of the 9x19mm round, versus the power of the .45 ACP round. Sure, the .45 has plenty of stopping power, but the 9mm isn't a weak round. It may take 3-5 rounds to the chest occasionally, but more important then the stopping power of a bullet is where it hits. The .45 has been recorded to take as many as five hits to the chest to kill, while there are multiple incidents of the nine-mil killing in one shot straight through the heart. Sure, stopping power is important, but becomes fairly irrelevant if you're not trying to keep the target alive, and if you actually know how to aim. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 06:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I recently ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
watched the trailer and there's a scene where Billy Connely and a thug face off and the thug is holding a revolver (Ruger Blackhawk maybe?)-[[User:Shooter|Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think they were webley's&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just saw the movie, and those are definitely Webleys. [[User:Acora|Acora]] 08:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the Glock 30 or I guess possibly the 26/27 not on the gun page?  II Duke has one on his left hand shoulder when he has his six guns strapped to him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LDA? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly don't think Romeo is using LDAs as evident by the full triggers.  They still may be Para-Ordnance, and I really like the Italian flag grips though. -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One of the armorers who worked on the movie told me that they were LDAs.  I wouldn't have written it otherwise. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 15:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wasn't he flag on the grips the Mexican flag, not the Italian one?-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 19:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  Not trying to be a prick here, but armorers can be wrong all the time.  Look at Hitman, or in the 1st Boondock Saints movie where the 92FS's transforms to PT92's.  Either way I am by no means an expert, if he's a professional movie armorer than who am I to contradict him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::'''''&amp;quot;but armorers can be wrong all the time&amp;quot;'''''? hahahaha.  Yes, they can be wrong ALL the time, but if they were, they wouldn't get much work now, would they? LOL [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 23:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.  I liked the grips eitherway.  -[[User:ZombieKiller|ZombieKiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as a quick note to anyone looking, these dont look like LDAs, they have the standard 1911 style SA skeleton trigger, I'm not sure if that trigger can be used in a double action pistol. Therefore My vote is that these are Para p-18s, especially since it's the same trigger used on the P-18s -Deadlysyn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BDS2-9.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Romeo ([[Clifton Collins, Jr.]]) racks the slide of his custom 45 - note that the words &amp;quot;El Jefe&amp;quot; are engraved in the slide - .45 acp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah they have SA triggers. Maybe they were converted to SA? Is that possible? --[[User:Predator20|Predator20]] 19:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe the armorer meant Agent Bloom's weapon was the LDA. Just watched special features and that's what I heard him say. - JanG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN FAL ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just saw the movie myself and am pretty sure those were not FN Fals in the armourer's cage but some type of assault shotgun with a side folding stock. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 13:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crew Cut ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hitman adversary is listed as using H&amp;amp;K USPs, but according to the armorer in special features, he uses Sig P226s. Also in the bar shootout where he takes the bartender hostage, you can clearly see that is is a Sig.  -  Jan&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:G.I._Joe:_The_Rise_of_Cobra&amp;diff=199957</id>
		<title>Talk:G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:G.I._Joe:_The_Rise_of_Cobra&amp;diff=199957"/>
		<updated>2009-11-04T07:12:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* Shotgun FIring Like A Machine Gun? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you want to know what that's about, read:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&amp;amp;article=62955&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At one point they were seriously going to make GI Joe an international force which had an acronym that ''happened'' to be &amp;quot;GI Joe.&amp;quot; [[User:Dongs|Dongs]] 03:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey Dongs, GI Joe is already ridiculous. Why not go all the way?-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 15:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The trailer for this movie would have made me cry if it weren't for the fact that I can supress such actions-[[Special:Contributions/76.31.5.208|76.31.5.208]] 17:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC) (S&amp;amp;Wshooter)&lt;br /&gt;
::Goddamm it Smith. I don't think you ''get'' retarded action movies.-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Whatever. If I want to see an action movie I'll go on netflix and get Wasabi, District B13 and Extreme Prejudice.-[[Special:Contributions/76.31.5.208|76.31.5.208]] 20:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC) (S&amp;amp;Wshooter)&lt;br /&gt;
::Those three are all good movies but they are serious. Well, atleast Extreme Prejudice is but the Retarded Action Movie is a great genre. Only if the movie is ''''NOT'''' serious though. For example, if Arnie and the crew that made [[Commando]] acted as if the movie they were making was completely serious, then the movie would be horrible but [[Commando]] doesn't take itself Seriously and because of that, the final product is a complete awesome movie full of one-liners, chessy acting and explosions. It's a perfect non-serious action movie.-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 20:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I am one serious man though, and regard those movies as comedy-not action. Plus, Wasabi is a funny ass movie-[[Special:Contributions/76.31.5.208|76.31.5.208]] 00:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC) (S&amp;amp;Wshooter)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, i'm a silly man so those movies are great fun to me.-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 15:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I do admit Commando was hilarious though. SAW BLADE IN THE FACE!-[[Special:Contributions/76.31.5.208|76.31.5.208]] 17:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC) (S&amp;amp;Wshooter)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I consider Commando to be one of the greatest movies of all time. I just love the final fight between Arnie and Bennett because the two of them ditch their guns because they want to fight with knifes. And the whole transition to fighting with knives is beautiful and to end the whole fight, we get Arnold ripping off a huge steam pipe and shoving it onto Bennett's chest and then Arnie says one of the best-one liners ever. &amp;quot;Let off some steam, Bennett.&amp;quot; It's an awesome movie.-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Also, hats off the the writers for giving Arnie's daughter a name they knew he couldn't pronounce, leaving him stomping around yelling &amp;quot;CHENNY WHERE ARE YOU CHENNY&amp;quot; for half the movie. [[User:Dongs|Dongs]] 19:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I can't believe i didn't notice that until now. That is really funny.-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 20:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I saw a trailer for this last night, looks to me like G.I. Joe meets ''[[Crysis]]'' or ''Halo''. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 18:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The clothes the Joes wear do look alot like the nanosuits from [[Crysis]].-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==African battle scene flashback==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, there [[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]]. Like your G.I. Joe Rise of Cobra screenshots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A favor, in Duke's flashback scene where he and Ripcord were in the African desert, can you send me some screenshots of the unit's weapons? I think I saw an M16A2 with Knights' RIS and M203 grenade launcher among the guns they used in the scene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Flashback_1.JPG|thumb|none|700px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Flashback_2.JPG|thumb|none|700px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Believe it or not, these are the best shots of the M16 available, they just move it around too much to get a better one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's some extra ones:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Flashback_3_duke.JPG|thumb|none|700px|Duke firing his M4A1.  Flashlight switch is attatched to his lower receiver.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Flashback_4_ripcord.JPG|thumb|none|700px|Ripcord reloading his M4A1.  Note flashlight pressure switch above the trigger of the M203]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Right now I'm trying to find a good shot of Ripcords 1911.  I'm sure I saw it, but just can't find it.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 06:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Female Joes ==&lt;br /&gt;
Is it just me or are they going to cast alot of hot women as the female Joes in this movie? I mean i get it that this is a retarded action-movie but it's not like action-movies need tits or an love interest.-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 16:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I watched it yesterday, it doesnt just have love interest, it has a complicated (read retarded) love triangle, that has everything you need, mind control, a crazy egomaniac, tragic past events (with flashbacks) and sci fi gun fights, what else could you ask for&lt;br /&gt;
:Lemme guess. It's between a male Joe and Scarlett and the Baroness?-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 12:19, 13 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite between duke, the baroness and destro, but your idea could have worked better&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only thing that pissed me off was that they didn't include Lady Jaye or (my personal favorite of the lady Joes) Mayday. I mean, come on, Lady Jaye is the ''original'' GI Jane! [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 07:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Any one else notice? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, just saw the movie and checked on here to see if you guys knew anything about the handfull of 1911s in the movie. There are a few nice shots especially when Duke is holding the baroness at gunpoint with what looks like a taurus pt1911 or a Kimber similar to the ones used in S.W.A.T. Not to mention the general (Dennis Quaid) has a 1911 that stays holstered the majority of the movie except when attacked by stormshadow. It appeared to have a mainspring magwell on it and original G.I. (no pun intended) grips. Any help would be awesome....thanks!&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe Duke does use a Kimber, and it also appears to have attachment rail too, so it's probably a Kimber Warrior.  I think Ripcord also hold the same sidearm, which got cut in half by Storm Shadow.&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, Warrior is what came to mind when I first saw them. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 07:47, 10 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's some screenshots so you guys can determine what they use&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dukes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dukes_1911A1.JPG|thumb|none|600px|Duke is clear but the 1911 is a bit blurry.  Best shot I could find]]&lt;br /&gt;
Dukes 1911 does look like a kimber warrior. Wide space front and back cocking serrations and a gi style guide rod. - Jan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ripcords:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ripcords_1911.JPG|thumb|none|600px|This is during the training montage so it could be a different one that gets cut in half.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General Hawks:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:General_Hawks_1911.JPG|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know guns well enough to even start guessing which version of the 1911 this is.  The part where he pulls it out is too dark and blurry.  If it helps, the slide is black.  I know this because it kept blending in with a bookcase, his shirt, and a closet every time I tried to get a good screenshot. Also, there's no good shots of the guns the Secret Service agents use.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 06:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shotgun FIring Like A Machine Gun? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw G.I. Joe last week, and during the attack on the Pit scene, Duke fires an automatic shotgun at a Neo-Viper, and I noticed it was firing like a machine gun (with machine gun sounds too). Wtf?! Someone screwed something up on the props or they just thought because it looked like a machine gun, no one would notice. I just thought it was weird.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
it actually fires that that's the sound it makes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its actually an AA-12 to the best of my knowledge. Its a Military assault shotgun featured on Future weapons. It can also fire a 12 guage grenade and with a full magazine can fire them in full auto.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know the AA-12 is a full auto shotgun, but the sound it made in the movie when Duke was shooting at Baroness as she was escaping the Pit was more a &amp;quot;ratatatat&amp;quot; like the m4 and not the &amp;quot;chugchugchug&amp;quot; like it did in future weapons. - Jan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unknown Rifle ==&lt;br /&gt;
I have a screen shot of an unknown rifle being shot next to the G36C in the beginning ambush sequence.  It looks like a DSA SA58 OSW to me but I wanted to make sure. - [[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36_sreen_cap.JPG|thumb|none|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Grenades ==&lt;br /&gt;
I believe these are Mk 2 &amp;quot;Pineapple&amp;quot; grenades, but I could be wrong - [[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk2_grenades.JPG|thumb|none|700px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Grenades_gi_joe2.JPG|thumb|none|700px|Better screenshot.  Yes, the whole time the left side has an afterimage.  The FX guys must have taken a still and just added the special effects without bothering to fix the problem.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ripcords_grenades.JPG|thumb|none|700px|Grenades on Ripcord]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Screencaps ==&lt;br /&gt;
Where the hell did you get those screencaps? They are not from a Bootleg are they?--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 20:36, 15 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah.  I can get screen caps for District 9 also if you want.  By bootleg, do you mean I got them from a guy in the street?  If that's so , then no.  And I did not use any kind of p2p program either.&lt;br /&gt;
::You what a bootleg is, righ? It's an illegal copy of an movie or videogame or music cd. If you didn't use a bootleg, how did you get those screencaps? Also, sign your posts by doing this: [[Image:Sigbutton.jpg|thumb|none|500px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 20:55, 15 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, they are bootleg, how else do you think I got them.  If you feel so strongly about it, then delete them and my account for all I care, I'm just trying to help.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:00, 15 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We know you are just trying to help. You've got your heart in the right place. The thing is, those screencaps are copyright infringiment. Some studio watchdog could come in here and get all of us in deep shit.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 21:06, 15 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
== Heavy's weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
Heavy seems to use a M249 w/ M203 and a Sage rotary launcher to destroy the machines used by cobra to get into the Joe's base&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Heavy_withM249%2BM203_and_sage_rotary_launcher.JPG|thumb|none|700px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Heavy_withM249%2BM203_and_sage_rotary_launcher2.JPG|thumb|none|700px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vehicle I.D.==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone know what Brandon Frasier is riding in this screenshot?  This is just a curiosity for me.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 06:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Unknown_vehicle_Joe.JPG|thumb|none|700px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hi gunkatas this is my first post&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the vehicle is an all-black Can-Am Spyder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:~)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:G.I._Joe:_The_Rise_of_Cobra&amp;diff=199956</id>
		<title>Talk:G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:G.I._Joe:_The_Rise_of_Cobra&amp;diff=199956"/>
		<updated>2009-11-04T07:09:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: /* Any one else notice? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you want to know what that's about, read:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&amp;amp;article=62955&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At one point they were seriously going to make GI Joe an international force which had an acronym that ''happened'' to be &amp;quot;GI Joe.&amp;quot; [[User:Dongs|Dongs]] 03:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey Dongs, GI Joe is already ridiculous. Why not go all the way?-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 15:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The trailer for this movie would have made me cry if it weren't for the fact that I can supress such actions-[[Special:Contributions/76.31.5.208|76.31.5.208]] 17:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC) (S&amp;amp;Wshooter)&lt;br /&gt;
::Goddamm it Smith. I don't think you ''get'' retarded action movies.-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Whatever. If I want to see an action movie I'll go on netflix and get Wasabi, District B13 and Extreme Prejudice.-[[Special:Contributions/76.31.5.208|76.31.5.208]] 20:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC) (S&amp;amp;Wshooter)&lt;br /&gt;
::Those three are all good movies but they are serious. Well, atleast Extreme Prejudice is but the Retarded Action Movie is a great genre. Only if the movie is ''''NOT'''' serious though. For example, if Arnie and the crew that made [[Commando]] acted as if the movie they were making was completely serious, then the movie would be horrible but [[Commando]] doesn't take itself Seriously and because of that, the final product is a complete awesome movie full of one-liners, chessy acting and explosions. It's a perfect non-serious action movie.-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 20:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I am one serious man though, and regard those movies as comedy-not action. Plus, Wasabi is a funny ass movie-[[Special:Contributions/76.31.5.208|76.31.5.208]] 00:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC) (S&amp;amp;Wshooter)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, i'm a silly man so those movies are great fun to me.-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 15:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I do admit Commando was hilarious though. SAW BLADE IN THE FACE!-[[Special:Contributions/76.31.5.208|76.31.5.208]] 17:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC) (S&amp;amp;Wshooter)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I consider Commando to be one of the greatest movies of all time. I just love the final fight between Arnie and Bennett because the two of them ditch their guns because they want to fight with knifes. And the whole transition to fighting with knives is beautiful and to end the whole fight, we get Arnold ripping off a huge steam pipe and shoving it onto Bennett's chest and then Arnie says one of the best-one liners ever. &amp;quot;Let off some steam, Bennett.&amp;quot; It's an awesome movie.-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Also, hats off the the writers for giving Arnie's daughter a name they knew he couldn't pronounce, leaving him stomping around yelling &amp;quot;CHENNY WHERE ARE YOU CHENNY&amp;quot; for half the movie. [[User:Dongs|Dongs]] 19:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I can't believe i didn't notice that until now. That is really funny.-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 20:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I saw a trailer for this last night, looks to me like G.I. Joe meets ''[[Crysis]]'' or ''Halo''. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 18:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The clothes the Joes wear do look alot like the nanosuits from [[Crysis]].-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 18:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==African battle scene flashback==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, there [[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]]. Like your G.I. Joe Rise of Cobra screenshots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A favor, in Duke's flashback scene where he and Ripcord were in the African desert, can you send me some screenshots of the unit's weapons? I think I saw an M16A2 with Knights' RIS and M203 grenade launcher among the guns they used in the scene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Flashback_1.JPG|thumb|none|700px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Flashback_2.JPG|thumb|none|700px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Believe it or not, these are the best shots of the M16 available, they just move it around too much to get a better one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's some extra ones:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Flashback_3_duke.JPG|thumb|none|700px|Duke firing his M4A1.  Flashlight switch is attatched to his lower receiver.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Flashback_4_ripcord.JPG|thumb|none|700px|Ripcord reloading his M4A1.  Note flashlight pressure switch above the trigger of the M203]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Right now I'm trying to find a good shot of Ripcords 1911.  I'm sure I saw it, but just can't find it.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 06:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Female Joes ==&lt;br /&gt;
Is it just me or are they going to cast alot of hot women as the female Joes in this movie? I mean i get it that this is a retarded action-movie but it's not like action-movies need tits or an love interest.-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 16:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I watched it yesterday, it doesnt just have love interest, it has a complicated (read retarded) love triangle, that has everything you need, mind control, a crazy egomaniac, tragic past events (with flashbacks) and sci fi gun fights, what else could you ask for&lt;br /&gt;
:Lemme guess. It's between a male Joe and Scarlett and the Baroness?-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 12:19, 13 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Not quite between duke, the baroness and destro, but your idea could have worked better&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only thing that pissed me off was that they didn't include Lady Jaye or (my personal favorite of the lady Joes) Mayday. I mean, come on, Lady Jaye is the ''original'' GI Jane! [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 07:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Any one else notice? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, just saw the movie and checked on here to see if you guys knew anything about the handfull of 1911s in the movie. There are a few nice shots especially when Duke is holding the baroness at gunpoint with what looks like a taurus pt1911 or a Kimber similar to the ones used in S.W.A.T. Not to mention the general (Dennis Quaid) has a 1911 that stays holstered the majority of the movie except when attacked by stormshadow. It appeared to have a mainspring magwell on it and original G.I. (no pun intended) grips. Any help would be awesome....thanks!&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe Duke does use a Kimber, and it also appears to have attachment rail too, so it's probably a Kimber Warrior.  I think Ripcord also hold the same sidearm, which got cut in half by Storm Shadow.&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, Warrior is what came to mind when I first saw them. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 07:47, 10 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's some screenshots so you guys can determine what they use&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dukes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dukes_1911A1.JPG|thumb|none|600px|Duke is clear but the 1911 is a bit blurry.  Best shot I could find]]&lt;br /&gt;
Dukes 1911 does look like a kimber warrior. Wide space front and back cocking serrations and a gi style guide rod. - Jan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ripcords:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ripcords_1911.JPG|thumb|none|600px|This is during the training montage so it could be a different one that gets cut in half.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General Hawks:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:General_Hawks_1911.JPG|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know guns well enough to even start guessing which version of the 1911 this is.  The part where he pulls it out is too dark and blurry.  If it helps, the slide is black.  I know this because it kept blending in with a bookcase, his shirt, and a closet every time I tried to get a good screenshot. Also, there's no good shots of the guns the Secret Service agents use.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 06:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shotgun FIring Like A Machine Gun? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw G.I. Joe last week, and during the attack on the Pit scene, Duke fires an automatic shotgun at a Neo-Viper, and I noticed it was firing like a machine gun (with machine gun sounds too). Wtf?! Someone screwed something up on the props or they just thought because it looked like a machine gun, no one would notice. I just thought it was weird.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
it actually fires that that's the sound it makes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its actually an AA-12 to the best of my knowledge. Its a Military assault shotgun featured on Future weapons. It can also fire a 12 guage grenade and with a full magazine can fire them in full auto.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unknown Rifle ==&lt;br /&gt;
I have a screen shot of an unknown rifle being shot next to the G36C in the beginning ambush sequence.  It looks like a DSA SA58 OSW to me but I wanted to make sure. - [[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36_sreen_cap.JPG|thumb|none|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Grenades ==&lt;br /&gt;
I believe these are Mk 2 &amp;quot;Pineapple&amp;quot; grenades, but I could be wrong - [[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk2_grenades.JPG|thumb|none|700px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Grenades_gi_joe2.JPG|thumb|none|700px|Better screenshot.  Yes, the whole time the left side has an afterimage.  The FX guys must have taken a still and just added the special effects without bothering to fix the problem.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ripcords_grenades.JPG|thumb|none|700px|Grenades on Ripcord]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Screencaps ==&lt;br /&gt;
Where the hell did you get those screencaps? They are not from a Bootleg are they?--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 20:36, 15 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah.  I can get screen caps for District 9 also if you want.  By bootleg, do you mean I got them from a guy in the street?  If that's so , then no.  And I did not use any kind of p2p program either.&lt;br /&gt;
::You what a bootleg is, righ? It's an illegal copy of an movie or videogame or music cd. If you didn't use a bootleg, how did you get those screencaps? Also, sign your posts by doing this: [[Image:Sigbutton.jpg|thumb|none|500px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 20:55, 15 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, they are bootleg, how else do you think I got them.  If you feel so strongly about it, then delete them and my account for all I care, I'm just trying to help.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:00, 15 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We know you are just trying to help. You've got your heart in the right place. The thing is, those screencaps are copyright infringiment. Some studio watchdog could come in here and get all of us in deep shit.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 21:06, 15 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
== Heavy's weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
Heavy seems to use a M249 w/ M203 and a Sage rotary launcher to destroy the machines used by cobra to get into the Joe's base&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Heavy_withM249%2BM203_and_sage_rotary_launcher.JPG|thumb|none|700px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Heavy_withM249%2BM203_and_sage_rotary_launcher2.JPG|thumb|none|700px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vehicle I.D.==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone know what Brandon Frasier is riding in this screenshot?  This is just a curiosity for me.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 06:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Unknown_vehicle_Joe.JPG|thumb|none|700px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hi gunkatas this is my first post&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the vehicle is an all-black Can-Am Spyder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:~)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Street_Kings&amp;diff=157001</id>
		<title>Talk:Street Kings</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Street_Kings&amp;diff=157001"/>
		<updated>2009-08-01T05:16:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I see you changed Ludlow's 1911 from a S&amp;amp;W to a RRA.  It is neither.  The cocking serrations on Ludlow's pistol are 90 degrees, while the serrations on all RRA pistols are angled at 11 degrees.  The frontstrap on Ludlow's pistol is a standard cut, while the RRA cuts their's very high and at a 90 degree angle.  Ludlow's 1911 has a pinned front sight; RRA uses a dovetail, and RRA uses a standard length serrated slidestop; not a flat extended stop.  Also note the magazine funnel, ambidextrous safety, stainless (not blued) barrel - none of which are on the RRA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I looked for the make of this pistol extensively, and came to the conclusion that it is a franken pistol built from a standard blued Colt; probably a series 70.  There are lots of competition add ons in stainless steel, and in black; none of which would come standard on a blued gun that lacks a high cut frontstrap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Yeah, I knew it was likely wrong, I'd been looking through my Standard Catalog of firearms and none of the RRA pistols fit the bill. I think it is likely just a custom Series 70 or Series 80. Thanks for the info.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello everyone. New account but I've been looking at these pages every time I watch a new movie.  Looking at this page, I noticed that you have Ludlow's 1911 is listed in the 1911 page as a sw1911. I noticed on the big picture that says similar to pistol in film that it says series 80 and Cylinder &amp;amp; Slide on the right side. I've ordered a couple of parts from Cylinder &amp;amp; Slide and I know they mostly use Springfield 1911s. Makes me wonder whether this is a C&amp;amp;S custom pistol, and whether it is a series 80 colt, or a sw1911.  -Jan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    - The snubby that Ludlow uses in the convenience store is actually a Charter Arms Off Duty.&lt;br /&gt;
- Good Call, I fixed it. -GM45&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Demille's shotgun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Benelli M3 section theres a pic of Demille pointing what is labeled as a Benelli M3. I think the shape of the pump and groove in the yop of the reciever is more indicative of a remington 870. Also the lack of a charging handle for semi-auto action rules out the M3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mossberg 590 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm starting to think this is a 500 with a heat-shield. I looks like it has a standard mag tube, a 590 has an extended. Am I wrong? -[[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Not Necessarily, MPM has two pictures that show the differences between a 590 and a 500, While I cannot see this picture clearly, It definitely looks more like a 590.&lt;br /&gt;
:By standard, I mean only the six shot tube. Since the barrel is clearly extending past the mag tube by a lot, I'm assuming it is just a 500. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16A2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Based on the shape of the carry handle, I'd actually say they like more like M16A4s, the carry handles look removable. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jan</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>